Cited by 87Workplace Violence and BullyingStress and Burnout ResearchJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Low Morale Experience of Academic Librarians: A Phenomenological Study

Kendrick, Kaetrena Davis·2017·Journal of Library Administration

Abstract

A dynamic body of knowledge about workplace bullying and burnout in academic libraries exists; however, there is a significant shortage of library and information science (LIS) literature regarding the related problem of low morale in any library environment; additionally, literature focusing on workplace bullying and burnout is quantitative, limiting insight into the animate experience of these events and inquiry into associated long-term effects. A phenomenological study was conducted to understand academic librarians' experience of low morale. Emergent themes connected workplace abuse, mental and physical health impacts, systemic influences, and the long-term consequences of low morale on LIS career trajectories.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01930826.2017.1368325

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bednall J., 2006, Issues in Educational Research, 16, 123
  2. 10.1057/9780230233546 · DOI
  3. Colaizzi P. F., 1978, Existential phenomenological alternatives in psychology, 48
  4. Creswell J. W., 2007, Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches
  5. 10.2307/1131945 · DOI
  6. 10.5860/crl.77.6.727 · DOI
  7. Kübler-Ross E., 1969, On death and dying: Finding the meaning of grief through the five stages of loss
  8. Lubans J., 2000, Library Administration & Management, 14, 218
  9. Maxfield D., 2016, Harvard Business Review
  10. McKnight D. H., 2001, Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 466
  11. Motin S. H., 2009, Association of College & Research Libraries 14th National Conference Papers
  12. Namie G., 2003, The bully at work: What you can do to stop the hurt and reclaim your dignity on the job
  13. Ortega A. C., 2017, Academic libraries and toxic leadership
  14. Porath C., 2013, Harvard Business Review
  15. Rogers M., 2001, Library Journal, 126, 20
  16. 10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00264-6 · DOI
  17. 10.5860/crl_44_03_245 · DOI
  18. Strauss A., 1990, Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Kendrick, K. D.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina Lancaster (US)
Corresponding author
Kendrick, Kaetrena Davis
Venue
Journal of Library Administration
Published
2017-09-07
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
846-878
ISSN
  • 0193-0826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-3564
OpenAlex
W2752590276
Cited by
87
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Library Administration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
academic librarians, workplace harassment, burnout, workplace abuse, mental health, physical health, career paths, library staffing, lived experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review