Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of Anti-Oppression with Group Work

Peters, Harvey Charles, Luke, Melissa·2023·The Journal for Specialists in Group Work

Abstract

This conceptual manuscript provides a call to action for group workers to incorporate the 10 principles of anti-oppression into the theory, practice, and research of group work. The 10 principles of anti-oppression emerged from a study using Critical Analytic Synthesis as a method to critically investigate, analyze, and synthesize the anti-oppression scholarship in counseling, counselor education, and allied health and education disciplines. The authors use this manuscript as the stimulus for a special issue applying these 10 principles to group work.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01933922.2023.2170508

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1080/01933920701431651 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/jmcd.12092 · DOI
  3. Gonzalez I. A., 2021, Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3, 26
  4. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1283-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/01933922.2022.2058286 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/9781119222774 · DOI
  7. Green C., 2021, Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3, 89
  8. 10.1080/01933922.2018.1561778 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1080/01933922.2019.1670024 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ceas.12027 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/01933921003706022 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/07481756.2022.2160357 · DOI
  13. 10.3102/00346543070001025 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/01933922.2013.775207 · DOI
  15. Mullaly B., 2017, Challenging Oppression and confronting privilege: A critical social work approach
  16. 10.1002/joec.12200 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/2326716X.2020.1854133 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/ceas.12251 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0011000020937431 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/01933922.2014.995042 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2009.tb00076.x · DOI
  22. 10.1080/01933921003705974 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/jmcd.12035 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1080/01933922.2012.721482 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/01933922.2019.1704115 · DOI
  26. 10.1891/9780826186072 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01642.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/ceas.12215 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peters, H. C., & Luke, M.
Affiliations
  • The George Washington University
  • Syracuse University
Venue
The Journal for Specialists in Group Work
Published
2023-01-27
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
84-89
ISSN
  • 0193-3922
  • 1549-6295
Cited by
12
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review