The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of Anti-Oppression with Group Work
Abstract
This conceptual manuscript provides a call to action for group workers to incorporate the 10 principles of anti-oppression into the theory, practice, and research of group work. The 10 principles of anti-oppression emerged from a study using Critical Analytic Synthesis as a method to critically investigate, analyze, and synthesize the anti-oppression scholarship in counseling, counselor education, and allied health and education disciplines. The authors use this manuscript as the stimulus for a special issue applying these 10 principles to group work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, group workers, as well as counselor educators, supervisors, and researchers are likely to encounter role conflicts as they endeavor to apply the Principles of Anti-Oppression to group work (Peters & Luke, 2022;Peters & Luke, 2023), necessitating additional reflexivity and resources for resolution in an ethical and effective manner (Okech et al., 2023).”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
In the citing paper
“Thus, we identified group work as the most logical site for the inaugural application of the principles of anti-oppression (Goodrich et al., 2023;Peters & Luke, 2023).”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
In the citing paper
“We, along with the six authorship teams in this special issue, concur that the 10 principles of anti-oppression (Peters & Luke, 2022) are”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
In the citing paper
“We agree that the principles of anti-oppression (Peters & Luke, 2022;Peters & Luke, 2023) are processfocused, and that they connote an ongoing, progressive, and iterative development.”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
In the citing paper
“Last, several special issue authorship teams noted that the principles of anti-oppression (Peters & Luke, 2022;Peters & Luke, 2023) differ from other counseling competencies or standards that serve as benchmarks that are either achieved or not.”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
In the citing paper
“That said, the measurement, efficacy, and influence of the application of the principles of anti-oppression (Peters & Luke, 2022;Peters & Luke, 2023) remains largely unexamined to date.”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
In the citing paper
“For example, while all six authorship teams indicated the need for future research related to varied aspects of anti-oppressive group work and the Principles of Anti-Oppression (Peters & Luke, 2022;Peters & Luke, 2023)”
From Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work (2023) · cites this paper as Peters & Luke, 2023
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Group Counseling & Psychotherapy
DeLucia-Waack, J. L. D.-W., Kalodner, C. R., & Riva, M. T. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781544308555 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1080/01933920701431651 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmcd.12092 · DOI
- Gonzalez I. A., 2021, Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3, 26
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-1283-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2022.2058286 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119222774 · DOI
- Green C., 2021, Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3, 89
- 10.1080/01933922.2018.1561778 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01933922.2019.1670024 · DOI
- 10.1002/ceas.12027 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933921003706022 · DOI
- 10.1080/07481756.2022.2160357 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543070001025 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2013.775207 · DOI
- Mullaly B., 2017, Challenging Oppression and confronting privilege: A critical social work approach
- 10.1002/joec.12200 · DOI
- 10.1080/2326716X.2020.1854133 · DOI
- 10.1002/ceas.12251 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0011000020937431 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2014.995042 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2009.tb00076.x · DOI
- 10.1080/01933921003705974 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmcd.12035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01933922.2012.721482 · DOI
- 10.1080/01933922.2019.1704115 · DOI
- 10.1891/9780826186072 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01642.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ceas.12215 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflections on the Application of the Principles of Anti-Oppression in Group Work
Luke, M., Peters, H. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2023) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2023.2204054
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, H. C., & Luke, M.
- Affiliations
- The George Washington University
- Syracuse University
- Venue
- The Journal for Specialists in Group Work
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-01-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-89
- ISSN
- 0193-3922
- 1549-6295
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review