Cited by 41Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Health and Nursing Education

Mindfulness-based interventions in secondary education: a qualitative systematic review / Intervenciones basadas en mindfulness en educación secundaria: una revisión sistemática cualitativa

Open access
Langer, Álvaro I., Ulloa, Valentina G., Cangas, Adolfo J., Rojas, Graciela, Krause, Mariane·2015·Estudios de Psicología

Abstract

In order to study the effects of mindfulness meditation interventions administered to adolescents within their educational institutions, a qualitative systematic review was conducted. Sixteen studies published in main databases were analysed. The results show that mindfulness, as a prevention strategy in educational contexts, resulted in significant changes in the followings variables: (a) psychological (e.g., reduction in depressive symptoms); (b) psychosocial (e.g., increased social skills); and (c) physiological (e.g., improvement of blood pressure). Although the results were conclusive, their interpretation and generalization should be carefully analysed as there were no medium- and long-term follow-up evaluations, in addition to the fact that there has been a minimal assessment of the psychological mechanisms involved in the change processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02109395.2015.1078553

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of mindfulness interventions in school context reports positive effects on emotional variables in adolescents of both sexes, but notes methodological limitations such as homogeneous samples that should be controlled in future studies.

    “una revisión sistemática de intervenciones que implementaron mindfulness en contexto escolar, dan cuenta de efectos positivos sobre variables emocionales en adolescentes de ambos sexos, sin embargo, existen ciertas limitaciones metodológicas como el uso de muestras homogéneas que se deben controlar en futuros estudios 14 .”
  • The sample size was relatively small and an active control group would have been the ideal design for this type of study.

    “el tamaño de la muestra fue relativamente pequeño y el uso de un grupo control activo habría sido el diseño ideal a utilizar en este tipo de estudios 14 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langer, Á. I., Ulloa, V. G., Cangas, A. J., Rojas, G., & Krause, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
  • University of Almería (ES)
  • University of Chile (CL)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Venue
Estudios de Psicología
Published
2015-09-02
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
533-570
ISSN
  • 0210-9395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1579-3699
OpenAlex
W2112194851
Cited by
40
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología (publishedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, mindfulness-based interventions, secondary education, adolescents, school-based prevention, depressive symptoms, social skills, blood pressure, psychological mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review