Cited by 101Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

Comparative morphology of the digestive system of 19 species of Southern African myomorph rodents in relation to diet and evolution

Perrin, M.R., Curtis, B.A.·1980·South African Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Trends in digestive system-morphology have been examined in 19 species of Southern African myomorph rodents. Structure was related to function, diet, and evolution. Characters related to an ancestral proteinaceous diet, and specialized characters associated with herbivory, were recognized. All stomachs were of the unilocular hemiglandular type with increasing degrees of cornification of the corpus, although the stomach of Saccostomus compestris approached the bilocular discoglandular condition. Those of Thallomys paedulcus and Mystromys albicaudatus were highly modified in containing numerous papillae in the corpus, possibly associated with gastric fermentation. The most complex caeca, of the herbivorous Otomyids, possessed numerous haustra and internal papillae probably associated with caecal microbial fermentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02541858.1980.11447680

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This pattern (voluminous, haustrated cecum) is recognised as a common feature in many rodents.

    “This pattern is recognised as a common feature in many rodents (Kotze et al., 2010;Perrin and Curtis 1980;Perez et al., 2008).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Perrin and Curtis 1980

  • The cecum of lagomorphs and rodents has been divided into three distinct anatomical segments: ampulla ceci, corpus ceci and apex ceci.

    “The cecum of lagomorphs and rodents has been divided into three distinct anatomical segments: ampulla ceci (the base of the cecum), corpus ceci and apex ceci (Perrin and Curtis 1980;Snipes 1981Snipes , 1982a,b;,b;Perez 2005Perez , 2007Perez , 2008)).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Perrin and Curtis 1980

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perrin, M. R., & Curtis, B. A.
Affiliations
Rhodes University (ZA)
Venue
South African Journal of Zoology
Published
1980-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
22-33
ISSN
0254-1858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2306820501
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • South African Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • African Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • University of Cape Town
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
digestive system morphology, myomorph rodents, herbivory, caeca, caecal fermentation, functional morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review