CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university

Bennett *, Roger·2005·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
DOI 10.1080/0260293042000264244
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A model intended to explain the incidence of plagiarism among undergraduates in the Business Studies department of a post‐1992 university was constructed and tested on a sample of 249 students completing Business Studies units at a post‐1992 university in Greater London. It was hypothesised that the occurrence of plagiarism could be predicted via three attitudinal considerations (individual perceptions of the ethicality of the practice, fear of penalties if caught and fear of failing a degree); two personal traits (goal orientation and academic integration), and three situational factors (financial, current grades achieved, and how strictly lecturing staff enforced anti‐plagiarism rules). Proposals concerning possible inter‐relations and interactions among these variables were also formulated and assessed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0260293042000264244

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1177/027347539802000106 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF00381934 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84 · DOI
  4. Archer L (2002, May 31) A question of motives Times Higher Education Supplement p. 14
  5. 10.1002/1520-6807(198010)17:4<515::AID-PITS2310170417>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/030987703200065154 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/1467-8535.00214 · DOI
  8. Bjorklund M Wenestam C (1999) Academic cheating: frequency, methods and causes Proceedings of the 1999 European Conference on Educational Research Lahti, Finland. Available online at: www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001364.htm
  9. 10.1177/0001848191041003002 · DOI
  10. Calabrese , R and Cochran , J . (1990) . The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents . Journal of Research & Development in Education , 23 (2) : 65 – 72 .
  11. 10.1108/09513540010310378 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/3150876 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1080/135580000750052955 · DOI
  14. 10.1207/s15328023top2202_6 · DOI
  15. 10.1207/s15328023top1901_3 · DOI
  16. Davis , S , Pierce , M , Yandell , L and Arnow , P . (1995) . Cheating in college and the Type A personality . College Student Journal , 29 (4) : 493 – 497 .
  17. Engelland B Alford B Taylor R (2001) Cautions and precautions on the use of ‘borrowed’ scales in marketing research in: T. Sutor (Ed.) Marketing advances in pedagogy, process & philosophy, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Marketing Advances (New Orleans, Society for Marketing Advances) 152 156
  18. 10.1080/03075079512331381673 · DOI
  19. Furedi F (2003, July 25) Shortcut to success Times Higher Education Supplement p. 16
  20. 10.1007/BF00992130 · DOI
  21. 10.1108/EUM0000000005595 · DOI
  22. Houle C (1961) The inquiring mind (Madison WI University of Wisconsin Press)
  23. 10.1002/ss.37119905105 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/3586911 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/0309877022000021748 · DOI
  26. Maslen G (2003, July 10) Dirty marks The Bulletin 3 4
  27. 10.1080/00091383.1996.10544253 · DOI
  28. McKenzie , J . (1998) . The new plagiarism: seven antidotes to prevent highway robbery in an electronic age . Educational Technology Journal , 7 (8) : 1 – 11 .
  29. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/01443410120090830 · DOI
  31. Myers , S . (1998) . Questioning author(ity): ESL/EFL, science and teaching about plagiarism . TESL‐EJ , 3 (2) : 11 – 20 .
  32. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.229 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/209358 · DOI
  34. Philips , M and Horton , V . (2000) . Cybercheating: has morality evaporated in business education? . International Journal of Educational Management , 14 (4) : 150 – 155 .
  35. 10.1108/09513549910278124 · DOI
  36. Sanders C (2002, February 1) Debt grows ever bigger and even more painful Times Higher Education Supplement pp. 6–7
  37. 10.1002/1520-6807(199507)32:3<233::AID-PITS2310320311>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  38. Stoynoff , S . (1996) . Self‐regulated learning strategies of international students: a study of high and low achievers . College Student Journal , 30 (2) : 329 – 336 .
  39. 10.1080/00220973.1995.11072392 · DOI
  40. 10.1108/09596110210427030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 117

Metadata

Authors
Bennett *, R.
Affiliations
London Metropolitan University
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
137-162
ISSN
  • 0260-2938
  • 1469-297X
DOI
10.1080/0260293042000264244
Cited by
117
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0260293042000264244
The paper
Bennett *, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264244