Cited by 88Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationAccounting Education and Careers

Understanding Student Plagiarism: An Empirical Study in Accounting Education

Guo, Xin·2011·Accounting Education

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to: (i) identify factors concerning student plagiarism in accounting education; (ii) develop and empirically test a model of factors influencing students' plagiaristic behaviour; and (iii) make recommendations to accounting educators to reduce the incidence of student plagiarism. A questionnaire was administrated to 381 UK accounting students. Structural equation modelling was used to assist data analysis. Research results indicate four antecedents of student plagiarism labelled: (i) academic integration; (ii) cultural influences; (iii) moral capability; and (iv) gender. The surface learning approach taken by accounting students is found to be positively associated with their pressures such as fear of failure and time pressure. The paper concludes by suggesting that educators should adopt a supportive approach to motivating students to act in a consistent, ethical manner in their academic life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09639284.2010.534577

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, X.
Affiliations
University of the West of Scotland (GB)
Corresponding author
Guo, Xin
Venue
Accounting Education
Published
2011-02
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
17-37
ISSN
  • 0963-9284 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4489
OpenAlex
W2170534430
Cited by
88
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accounting Education (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Undergraduate Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Education and Careers
Keywords
student plagiarism, academic integrity, surface learning, fear of failure, time pressure, cultural influence, gender differences, academic integration, plagiarism avoidance, moral behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review