The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing
Abstract
This paper presents a small‐scale exploratory study, which focuses on the impact of formative assessment that was provided as part of a writing intervention in a first‐year undergraduate programme. Qualitative data were collected to find evidence of use of formative feedback, and of resulting improvements, as well as to shed some light on students’ inclination to use feedback. Uptake and use of the formative feedback was assessed by an analysis of feedback comments on students’ texts as well as by students’ interviews. The findings showed that students who had utilised their feedback comments improved in the areas previously criticised. In the texts of several students, however, the same problems persisted; it became apparent in the interviews that they had paid little attention to their feedback comments and not acted upon them. The interviews also uncovered reasons for engagement or non‐engagement with the feedback. These include students’ high or low motivation based on the enjoyment of the degree programme and self‐perceptions of their ability as writers. It is argued that more attention needs to be paid to tone, style and amount of feedback comments to ensure that students with low motivation and a low self‐perception utilise them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An exception is a study by Wingate (2010), which suggests that critical feedback tended to be a motivator for improving writing for undergraduate students with higher levels of self-efficacy than students with lower levels of self-efficacy, for whom feedback was discouraging and promoted negative emotions.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Wingate (2010)
In the citing paper
“Qualitative studies have shown that various factors, including students' emotions and judgments about the feedback, might influence behavioral responses, as well as how well students understand the feedback (e.g., Lipnevich and Smith, 2009b;Wingate, 2010;Winstone et al., 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Wingate, 2010
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,406
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1995) · Cited by 5,724
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective
Meyer, C. F., Halliday, Μ. Α. Κ., & Hasan, R. (1987) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586740 · Cited by 4,151
Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Vallerand, R. J. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 1×
“In addition, the concept of intrinsic motivation (Ryan and Deci 1985; Vallerand 1997) can be used to explain students’ engagement with assessment feedback through their enjoyment of, and interest in learning.”
BackgroundStudent writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,608
Differing perceptions in the feedback process
Carless, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572132 · Cited by 1,102
Yorke, M. (2003) · Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1023967026413 · Cited by 973
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ferris , D. 2008 . “ Feedback: Issues and options ” . In Teaching academic writing , Edited by: Friedrich , P. 93 – 120 . London : Continuum .
- Hounsell , D. 1987 . “ Essay writing and the quality of feedback ” . In Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology , Edited by: Richardson , J. , Eysenck , M.W. and Piper , D.W. 109 – 19 . Milton Keynes : Open University Press .
- Martin , J.R. 1999 . “ Mentoring semogenesis: ‘Genre‐based’ literacy pedagogy ” . In Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes , Edited by: Christie , F. 123 – 55 . London : Cassell .
- 10.1023/A:1009017532121 · DOI
- Winch , C. and Wells , P. 1994 . The quality of student writing: A cause for concern . British Journal of Educational Studies , 43 ( 1 ) : 75 – 87 . · DOI
- Wojtas , O. 1998 . Feedback? No, just give us the answers . Times Higher Education Supplement ,
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
Evans, C. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312474350 · Cited by 1,143
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884
The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154 · Cited by 414
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 · Cited by 306
Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2011) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.525630 · Cited by 336
Self-citationImproving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment
Hill, J., & West, H. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908 · Cited by 196
Responsibility-Sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback
Nash, R. A., & Winstone, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519 · Cited by 140
Dowden, T., Pittaway, S. M., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.632676 · Cited by 128
Winstone, N., Boud, D. J., Dawson, P., & Heron, M. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1902467 · Cited by 141
Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10030060 · Cited by 104
Williams, A. E. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijres.3404 · Cited by 139
Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks
Ajjawi, R., Kent, F., Broadbent, J., Tai, J. H.-M., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2022) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115 · Cited by 91
Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1688764 · Cited by 104
Using the assessment process to overcome Imposter Syndrome in mature students
Chapman, A. (2015) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2015.1062851 · Cited by 113
(2016) · Grantee Submission · Cited by 79
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751548 · Cited by 71
Facilitating Students’ Active Engagement with Feedback
Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.026 · Cited by 69
Suraworachet, W., Zhou, Q., & Cukurova, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00368-0 · Cited by 68
Stewart, G., Seifert, T. A., & Rolheiser, C. (2015) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.1.4 · Cited by 67
Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001 · Cited by 76
Walker, M. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.898737 · Cited by 64
Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios
Bader, M., Burner, T., Iversen, S. H., & Varga, Z. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1564811 · Cited by 61
Effectively feeding forward from one written assessment task to the next
Vardi, I. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.670197 · Cited by 56
A Comparison of “Additional” and “Embedded” Approaches to Teaching Writing in the Disciplines
Wingate, U. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-34451-8_5 · Cited by 47
Self-citationHuang, S.-C. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1042426 · Cited by 44
Performance, Feedback, and Revision: Metacognitive Approaches to Undergraduate Essay Writing
Riddell, J. (2015) · Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching · doi:10.22329/celt.v8i0.4256 · Cited by 47
Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., Lara, M. M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2022) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102175 · Cited by 41
Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: a Chinese case
Xiang, X., Yuan, R. E., & Yu, B. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1965539 · Cited by 41
Vardi, I. (2011) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.611865 · Cited by 47
Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing
Afrin, T., Kashefi, O., Olshefski, C. A., Litman, D., Hwa, R., & Godley, A. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445683 · Cited by 44
Tutor feedback on draft essays: developing students’ academic writing and subject knowledge
Court, K. (2012) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2012.706806 · Cited by 39
Strategy Uptake in Writing Pal: Adaptive Feedback and Instruction
Butterfuss, R., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331211045304 · Cited by 34
González-Lamas, J., Cuevas, I., & Mateos, M. (2016) · Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2015.1111606 · Cited by 32
van Heerden, M., Clarence, S., & Bharuthram, S. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1212985 · Cited by 32
Assessment for learning: Why assessment does not always support student teachers’ learning
Mumm, K., Karm, M., & Remmik, M. (2015) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2015.1062847 · Cited by 34
The Challenge of Assessing Creative Problem Solving in Client-Based Marketing Development Projects
Jaskari, M.-M. E. (2013) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475313485586 · Cited by 26
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751549 · Cited by 43
What students don't make of feedback in higher education: An illustrative study
Green, S. (2019) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.010 · Cited by 23
The use of exemplars in English writing classrooms: from theory to practice
Chong, S. W. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1535051 · Cited by 22
Learning from contrasts: first-year students writing themselves into academic literacy
Roald, G. M., Wallin, P., Hybertsen, I. D., & Stenöien, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2020.1813264 · Cited by 21
Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002 · Cited by 20
Bautista, I. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-016-0028-8 · Cited by 29
Calvo, S., Celini, L., Morales, A., Martínez, J. M. G., & Utrilla, P. N.-C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12031155 · Cited by 19
Isaias, P. T., & Issa, T. (2013) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9257-9 · Cited by 18
Sarid, M., Peled, Y., & Vaknin‐Nusbaum, V. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10111-8 · Cited by 19
Sun, Q., & Soden, B. (2021) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100981 · Cited by 21
Rahmi, R., Amalina, Z., Andriansyah, A., & Rodgers, A. (2024) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v11i2.35875 · Cited by 38
Clarke, P. M., Schull, D. N., Coleman, G. T., Pitt, R., & Manathunga, C. E. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.630975 · Cited by 17
Like a bell responding to a striker: Instruction contingent on assessment
Huang, S.-C. (2012) · English Teaching Practice & Critique · Cited by 17
How first-year students perceive and experience assessment of academic literacies
Zhou, J., Zhao, K., & Dawson, P. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1637513 · Cited by 17
Teaching Academic Literacies in international relations: towards a pedagogy of practice
Olsson, E. M., Gelot, L., Schaffer, J. K., & Litsegård, A. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1992753 · Cited by 15
Cultivating student skills in self-regulated learning through evaluation of task complexity
Belski, R., & Belski, I. (2014) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.880685 · Cited by 18
McSweeney, F. (2013) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.770832 · Cited by 15
Supporting students’ assignment writing: what lecturers do in a Master of Education programme
Li, Y., & Hu, G. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1274017 · Cited by 15
Instructor Comments on Student Writing: Learner Response to Electronic Written Feedback
McGrath, A. L., & Atkinson‐Leadbeater, K. (2016) · Cited by 15
Feed-forward: Paving ways for students' subsequent learning
Ghazal, L., Khowaja, A. A., Parpio, Y. N., Tharani, A. J., & Gul, R. B. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.010 · Cited by 13
Issues and agency: postgraduate student and tutor experiences with written feedback
Sánchez, H. S., & Dunworth, K. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.921885 · Cited by 13
Teacher Intentions vs Student Perception of Feedback on Laboratory Reports
Jørgensen, J. T., Gammelgaard, B., & Christiansen, F. V. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01148 · Cited by 16
Pedagogy for fostering criticality, reflectivity and praxis in a course on teaching for lecturers
Quinn, L., & Vorster, J.-A. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1066756 · Cited by 12
Frattarola, A., Leong, A. P., & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2024) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882241269632 · Cited by 11
Hill, L., & Edwards, F. (2019) · Assessment Matters · doi:10.18296/am.0036 · Cited by 11
Literacy: From the Perspective of Text and Discourse Theory
McNamara, D. S., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Balyan, R., & McCarthy, K. S. (2019) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2019.10196 · Cited by 10
Supporting Collaborative Writing Tasks in Large-Scale Distance Education
Burchart, M., & Haake, J. M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3355791 · Cited by 9
Providing constructive feedback on learning patterns: An individual learner’s perspective
Donche, V., Coertjens, L., Vanthournout, G., & Petegem, P. V. (2012) · Reflecting education · Cited by 9
Arneback, E., Englund, T., & Solbrekke, T. D. (2017) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2017.1389226 · Cited by 14
Revising with Metacognition to Promote Writing Achievement
Sachar, C. O. (2020) · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14434/josotl.v20i3.28675 · Cited by 8
Social Support, Student Outcomes and Teaching Strategies
Lam, B. H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3577-8_4 · Cited by 10
Li, K., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Hu, W. W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09690-8 · Cited by 8
Speaking the same language: Developing a language-aware feedback culture
Lazar, G., & Ryder, A. (2017) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2017.1403940 · Cited by 7
Feedback and Learning Support That Fosters Students’ Independent Learning: An Australian Case Study
Issa, T., Issa, T., & Kommers, P. (2014) · The International Journal of Learning Annual Review · doi:10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v19/58837 · Cited by 7
Feedback and formative assessment—looking backwards to move forward
McCarthy, N., Neville, K., & Pope, A. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00414-9 · Cited by 14
The impact of peer-review on undergraduate grades when students decide whether to participate
Cook, B. R., Kamstra, P., Savige, T., Bannan, L.-A., Tjandra, E., Alexandra, A. N., & Cornes, I. C. (2020) · Journal of Geography in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03098265.2020.1804844 · Cited by 6
The Case of Screencast Feedback: Barriers to the Use of Learning Technology
Soden, B. (2017) · Innovative practice in higher education · Cited by 6
Formative Assessment of Writing (FAoW): A Confirmatory Factor Structure Study
Tavakoli, E., AMİRİAN, M. R., Burner, T., Davoudi, M., & Ghaniabadi, S. (2019) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.544277 · Cited by 6
On editor decisions: A framework of best practice
Crawford, J. (2022) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.19.3.01 · Cited by 6
Self-regulating writers’ uses and non-uses of peer feedback
Usher, N. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2179970 · Cited by 5
An Education Model for Game Development by A Swedish-Japanese Industry-Academia Alliance
Sato, Y., Hanaoka, H., Engström, H., & Kurabayashi, S. (2020) · IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) · doi:10.1109/cog47356.2020.9231558 · Cited by 5
Parrott, H. M., & Cherry, E. (2014) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.1177/0092055x14557440 · Cited by 5
Guzmán‐Simón, F., Gordillo, J. J. T., & Rodríguez, K. C. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10040116 · Cited by 5
van Heerden, M., & Bharuthram, S. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2024.2437114 · Cited by 4
Gloria, R. Y., & Sudarmin, S. (2018) · JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA · doi:10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i2.9507 · Cited by 4
Process genre approach to L2 academic writing: An intervention study
Hanušová, S., Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O., Vališová, M. L., & Matulová, M. (2020) · XLinguae · doi:10.18355/xl.2020.13.04.03 · Cited by 4
Student Collaboration Through Assessment, Feedback and Peer Instruction
Chang-Tik, C. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4383-6_3 · Cited by 5
Assessment, Assessment Rubrics and Feedback
Rajaram, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9201-8_9 · Cited by 6
Exploring the Efficacy of Rubric-Based AI Feedback in Enhancing Student Writing Outcomes
Lai, P. P. Y., Lau, I. C. H., & Pang, R. (2024) · International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Education (WAIE) · doi:10.1109/waie63876.2024.00047 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of Course Curriculum and Teaching
Coyle, J. P., Carter, I., Campbell, D., & Talor, O. (2013) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4458-8.ch017 · Cited by 5
An Automated Writing Evaluation System for Supporting Self-monitored Revising
Litman, D. J., Afrin, T., Kashefi, O., Olshefski, C. A., GODLEY, A. J., & Hwa, R. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_52 · Cited by 4
Chang, T., Lee, G. T., Bruce, A. T., Powell, D. N., & Yang, L.-H. (2022) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941221119407 · Cited by 4
O’Brien, O., & Dowling‐Hetherington, L. (2013) · AISHE-J · doi:10.62707/aishej.v5i1.96 · Cited by 4
Burston, J., Athanasiou, A., & Neophytou, M. (2017) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages2030016 · Cited by 4
Unpacking Student Responses to Discrepant Peer and Teacher Feedback: A Cross-National Comparison
Lopera-Oquendo, C., Lipnevich, A. A., Tomazin, L., Máñez, I., León, S. P., & Beatson, N. J. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102394 · Cited by 3
Impact of formative feedback on student motivation to write in eighth grade English courses
Nielsen, D. (2015) · Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · Cited by 3
Higher Education, Academic Writing Assessment and Formative Feedback
Shrestha, P. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55845-1_1 · Cited by 3
Maximizing Feedback for Self-Regulated Learning
Hemerda, J. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 3
Lui, A. M. (2020) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/7mg3-x499 · Cited by 3
Understanding EFL students’ learning through classroom research: Experiences of teacher-researchers
Soto, S. T. (2020) · Editorial UTMACH eBooks · doi:10.48190/9789942241375 · Cited by 4
Instructor Comments on Student Writing
McGrath, A. L., & Atkinson‐Leadbeater, K. (2016) · Transformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal · doi:10.59236/td2016vol8iss31115 · Cited by 2
McSweeney, F. (2014) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · doi:10.21427/d75485 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wingate, U.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wingate, Ursula
- ORCID
- Wingate, Ursula
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 519-533
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2070602943
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 31.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- formative feedback, academic writing, writing intervention, first-year students, feedback uptake, student motivation, writing development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review