The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance
Abstract
In the last decade, with the increased attention to learner-centred curricula, the topic of self-assessment and peer assessment has become of particular interest in testing and evaluation. The present study explores the role of self-assessment, and peer assessment in promoting writing performance of language learners. To do this, 157 intermediate TEFL (Teaching English as Foreign Language) students were assigned to five different treatments in five groups: four experimental groups and one control group. The first experimental group did journal writing as a self-assessment technique, the second group self-assessed their own writings, the third group employed peer assessment, and the fourth group had both self- and peer assessment. Moreover, there was teacher assessment in all experimental groups, except the fourth group, i.e., the self- and peer assessment group. In the control group, there was only teacher assessment. Also, at the beginning and end of the semester, all participants took a writing test. The design of the study was quasi-experimental, non-randomised control group, pre-test–post-test design. The results revealed that in the second and third groups, in which the students employed self-assessment and peer assessment, together with teacher assessment, we observed the maximum improvement in writing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peer feedback compared to feedback from teaching staff showed an intermediate sized, non-significant composite effect size of 0.46 (95% CI -0.44 to 1.36) based on three studies (Cho and Schunn 2007; Hartberg et al. 2008; Birjandi and Tamjid 2012).
“The third comparison was that between peer feedback and feedback from teaching staff. Here, the direction of effects was mixed across the three studies (Cho and Schunn 2007; Hartberg et al. 2008; Birjandi and Tamjid 2012), resulting in an intermediate sized, though non-significant composite effect size of 0.46 [-0.44, 1.36].”
From The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Birjandi and Tamjid 2012
Cites
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A number of researchers, such as Tsui and Ng ( 2000 ), have also recommended peer review as a collaborative activity to secure immediate textual improvement and, in the long run, to develop writing competence through mutual scaffolding.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Self-assessment complements peer assessment for undergraduate students in an academic writing task
Cheong, C. M., Luo, N., Zhu, X., Lu, Q., & Wei, W. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2069225 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Vasileiadou, D., & Karadimitriou, K. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100031 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Tang, L., Shen, K., Le, H., Shen, Y., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Juelich, T., Li, X., Gašević, D., & Fan, Y. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13036 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Rezai, A., Naserpour, A., & Rahimi, S. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2086575 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IR)
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 513-533
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2170582863
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- self-assessment, peer assessment, teacher assessment, EFL writing, writing performance, journaling, learner-centred curriculum, Iranian EFL learners, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review