Cited by 198Evaluation of Teaching PracticesEducational Assessment and PedagogyStudent Assessment and Feedback

An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in course design and its impact on students’ learning approaches

Wang, Xiaoyan, Su, Yelin, Cheung, Stephen, Wong, Eva, Kwong, Theresa·2013·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

This paper investigates whether instructors’ adoption of constructive alignment has any impact on university students’ learning approaches, which are highly correlated with students’ achievement of learning outcomes. A multi-method model with a combination of qualitative and quantitative design was adopted, using document analysis, interviews and survey. The analysis of covariance results suggested that regardless of individual differences, students would adjust their learning approaches and study behaviours in response to the classroom teaching and learning environment. Students in more ‘constructively aligned courses’ were more likely to adopt deep learning approaches and less likely to use surface learning approaches in their study of a particular course.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602938.2012.658018

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Su, Y., Cheung, S., Wong, E., & Kwong, T.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiaoyan
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2013-06
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
477-491
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W2063704520
Cited by
198
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
31.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
constructive alignment, course design, learning methods, deep learning, surface learning, study behavior, learning outcomes, teaching and learning environment, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review