Zoos as a source of free choice learning
Abstract
This paper reports on an inquiry into the use of zoos as a source of informal or free choice learning. The study was contexualised within the zoo's environmental enrichment programme (an animal husbandry principle that seeks to develop species-typical behaviour for captive animals by using naturalistic enclosures or artificial items that stimulate animal interest). Visitor perceptions and actual use of the zoo were investigated using structured interviews based on an interview protocol that elicited their perspectives of the nature and character of zoo settings including the use of photographs of selected exhibits to induce stimulated recall. These data were triangulated with unobtrusive observation at the same exhibits (Bitgood et al., 1988). The visitors spent little time at a given exhibit, and rated the more naturalistic or enriched exhibits more favourably, but older visitors seemed less concerned with naturalness of exhibits. The zoo considers that it has an important role in education and provides many opportunities for learning for both general visitors and school groups. Both general visitors and school groups reported that the prime purpose of their visit was for entertainment. It appears learning of science at the zoo is limited for general visitors, however, the learning of science for school children is enhanced by pre- and post-visit activities and strong curricula links.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The absence of a visible physical barrier fosters a more positive attitude by the public towards the animals.
“At the same time, the absence of a visible physical barrier fosters a more positive attitude by the public towards the animals (Tofield et al., 2003).”
From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Tofield et al., 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Animal–visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions
Fernandez, E. J., Tamborski, M. A., Pickens, S. R., & Timberlake, W. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.06.002 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Ozella, L., Anfossi, L., Di Nardo, F., & Pessani, D. (2017) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.12.002 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tofield, S., Coll, R. K., Vyle, B., & Bolstad, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- Venue
- Research in Science & Technological Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-99
- ISSN
- 0263-5143 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1138
- OpenAlex
- W1971596723
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 110.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Science & Technological Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- zoos, informal learning, free-choice learning, environmental enrichment, captive animals, species-typical behavior, tourist perceptions, stimulated recall, school groups, science education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review