Cited by 112Museums and Cultural HeritageAnimal and Plant Science EducationScience Education and Pedagogy

Zoos as a source of free choice learning

Tofield, Sara, Coll, Richard K., Vyle, Brent, Bolstad, Rachel·2003·Research in Science & Technological Education

Abstract

This paper reports on an inquiry into the use of zoos as a source of informal or free choice learning. The study was contexualised within the zoo's environmental enrichment programme (an animal husbandry principle that seeks to develop species-typical behaviour for captive animals by using naturalistic enclosures or artificial items that stimulate animal interest). Visitor perceptions and actual use of the zoo were investigated using structured interviews based on an interview protocol that elicited their perspectives of the nature and character of zoo settings including the use of photographs of selected exhibits to induce stimulated recall. These data were triangulated with unobtrusive observation at the same exhibits (Bitgood et al., 1988). The visitors spent little time at a given exhibit, and rated the more naturalistic or enriched exhibits more favourably, but older visitors seemed less concerned with naturalness of exhibits. The zoo considers that it has an important role in education and provides many opportunities for learning for both general visitors and school groups. Both general visitors and school groups reported that the prime purpose of their visit was for entertainment. It appears learning of science at the zoo is limited for general visitors, however, the learning of science for school children is enhanced by pre- and post-visit activities and strong curricula links.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02635140308342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tofield, S., Coll, R. K., Vyle, B., & Bolstad, R.
Affiliations
University of Waikato (NZ)
Venue
Research in Science & Technological Education
Published
2003-05
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
67-99
ISSN
  • 0263-5143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1138
OpenAlex
W1971596723
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
110.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Science & Technological Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
zoos, informal learning, free-choice learning, environmental enrichment, captive animals, species-typical behavior, tourist perceptions, stimulated recall, school groups, science education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review