The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sleep duration and quality in elite athletes measured using wristwatch actigraphy
Abstract
Sleep is known to be an important component of recovery from training, yet little is known about the quality and quantity of sleep achieved by elite athletes. The aim of the present study was to quantify sleep in elite athletes using wristwatch actigraphy. Individual nights of sleep from a cohort of Olympic athletes (n = 47) from various sports were analysed and compared to non-athletic controls (n = 20). There were significant differences between athletes and controls in all measures apart from 'time asleep' (p = 0.27), suggesting poorer characteristics of sleep in the athlete group. There was a significant effect of gender on 'time awake' (mean difference: 12 minutes higher in males; 95% likely range: 3 to 21 minutes) and 'sleep efficiency' (mean difference: 2.4 lower in males; 95% likely range: 0.1 to 4.8). Athletes showed poorer markers of sleep quality than an age and sex matched non-athletic control group (Sleep efficiency: 80.6 ± 6.4% and 88.7 ± 3.6%, respectively. Fragmentation Index: 36.0 ± 12.4 and 29.8 ± 9.0, respectively) but remained within the range for healthy sleep. This descriptive study provides novel data for the purpose of characterising sleep in elite athletes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Consolidation
Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 2×
“The concept of sleep-dependent brain plasticity (Walker and Stickgold, 2004 ) reinforces the importance of sleep in elite athletes by its effects on the consolidation of motor skill learning.”
BackgroundDriver, H. S., & Taylor, S. R. (2000) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1053/smrv.2000.0110 · Cited by 769
Cited by
International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Caffeine and Exercise Performance
Guest, N. S., VanDusseldorp, T. A., Nelson, M. T., Grgic, J., Schoenfeld, B. J., Jenkins, N. D. M., Arent, S. M., Antonio, J., Stout, J. R., Trexler, E. T., et al. (2021) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12970-020-00383-4 · Cited by 665
Sleep in elite athletes and nutritional interventions to enhance sleep
Halson, S. L. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0147-0 · Cited by 502
Does Elite Sport Degrade Sleep Quality? A Systematic Review
Gupta, L., Morgan, K., & Gilchrist, S. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0650-6 · Cited by 410
Stress, Sleep and Recovery in Elite Soccer: A Critical Review of the Literature
Nédélec, M., Halson, S., Abaidia, A.-E., Ahmaidi, S., & Dupont, G. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0358-z · Cited by 291
Sleep Hygiene for Optimizing Recovery in Athletes: Review and Recommendations
Vitale, K. C., Owens, R., Hopkins, S. R., & Malhotra, A. (2019) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/a-0905-3103 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Leeder, J., Glaister, M., Pizzoferro, K., Dawson, J., & Pedlar, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 541-545
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W2065449724
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
