Cited by 249Sports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSport Psychology and Performance

Explosive force production during isometric squats correlates with athletic performance in rugby union players

Tillin, Neale Anthony, Pain, Matthew Thomas Gerard, Folland, Jonathan·2013·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

This study investigated the association between explosive force production during isometric squats and athletic performance (sprint time and countermovement jump height). Sprint time (5 and 20 m) and jump height were recorded in 18 male elite-standard varsity rugby union players. Participants also completed a series of maximal- and explosive-isometric squats to measure maximal force and explosive force at 50-ms intervals up to 250 ms from force onset. Sprint performance was related to early phase (≤100 ms) explosive force normalised to maximal force (5 m, r = -0.63, P = 0.005; and 20 m, r = -0.54, P = 0.020), but jump height was related to later phase (>100 ms) absolute explosive force (0.51 < r < 0.61; 0.006 < P < 0.035). When participants were separated for 5-m sprint time (< or ≥ 1s), the faster group had greater normalised explosive force in the first 150 ms of explosive-isometric squats (33-67%; 0.001 < P < 0.017). The results suggest that explosive force production during isometric squats was associated with athletic performance. Specifically, sprint performance was most strongly related to the proportion of maximal force achieved in the initial phase of explosive-isometric squats, whilst jump height was most strongly related to absolute force in the later phase of the explosive-isometric squats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2012.720704

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with pure maximal voluntary contraction strength, rate of force development seems better related to most performances of both sport-specific and functional daily tasks.

    “as compared to pure maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) strength, RFD seems to be (1) better related to most performances of both sport-specific and functional daily tasks (see, e.g., Maffiuletti et al. 2010; Tillin et al. 2013a)”

    From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2013a

  • Strength-trained athletes (elite rugby players) with a high RFD demonstrated substantially faster 5-m sprint (acceleration) times (<1 s) than athletes with a lower RFD (slower 5-m sprint times, ≥1 s).

    “strength-trained athletes (elite rugby players) with a high RFD demonstrated substantially faster 5-m sprint (acceleration) times (<1 s) than athletes with a lower RFD (slower 5-m sprint times, ≥1 s) (Tillin et al. 2013a).”

    From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2013a

  • A negative linear relationship (r2 = 0.42, p < 0.05) was observed between 5-m sprint time and relative RFD obtained at 100 ms.

    “a negative linear relationship (r2 = 0.42, p < 0.05) was observed between 5-m sprint time and relative RFD obtained at 100 ms (Tillin et al. 2013a).”

    From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2013a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tillin, N. A., Pain, M. T. G., & Folland, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Roehampton (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Tillin, Neale Anthony
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2013-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
66-76
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2019993999
Cited by
249
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
explosive power, isometric squat, rugby union, sprint performance, countermovement jump, athletic performance, peak force, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Physical Exertion, Humans, Male, Running, Weight Lifting, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review