Cited by 45Medicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsSports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

Effects of short-term Rhodiola Rosea (Golden Root Extract) supplementation on anaerobic exercise performance

Ballmann, Christopher G., Maze, Shelby B., Wells, Abby C., Marshall, Mallory R., Rogers, Rebecca R.·2019·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short-term Rhodiola Rosea (Golden Root Extract (GRE)) supplementation on repeated Wingate performance. Eleven physically active college aged females were recruited for this study. In a within groups counterbalanced study design, participants were supplemented with either 1,500 mg/day of GRE or placebo (gluten-free cornstarch) for 3 days. Participants also took an additional 500 mg dose of corresponding treatment 30 minutes prior to testing of each trial. During each exercise trial, participants completed 3 × 15-second Wingate Anaerobic Tests (WAnTs) separated by 2-minute active recovery periods. Each exercise trial was separated by a 7 day washout period. Over the 3 × 15-second WAnTs, mean watts (p = 0.017, ES = 0.55), mean anaerobic capacity (p = 0.025, ES = 0.96), mean anaerobic power (p = 0.03, ES = 1.07), mean peak watts (p = 0.029,ES = 0.46), and mean total work (p = 0.017, ES = 0.49) were higher in the GRE treatment trial versus placebo. However, mean fatigue index (p = 0.094, ES = 0.39) was unaffected regardless of treatment. Our results show that GRE supplementation enhanced anaerobic exercise performance as measured through repeated WAnTs. GRE may possess ergogenic benefits and findings hold important implications for boosting anaerobic performance in repeated anaerobic bouts of exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2018.1538028

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intake of Rhodiola rosea is not associated with serious side effects.

    “The intake of Rhodiola rosea is not associated with serious side effects [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].”

    From Plant Adaptogens—History and Future Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [77]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballmann, C. G., Maze, S. B., Wells, A. C., Marshall, M. R., & Rogers, R. R.
Affiliations
Samford University (US)
Corresponding author
Ballmann, Christopher G.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
998-1003
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2899132120
Cited by
45
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Rhodiola rosea, dietary supplementation, anaerobic exercise performance, Wingate test, repeated sprint performance, ergogenic aids, fatigue index, female athletes
MeSH terms
Exercise Test, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Plant Extracts, Dietary Supplements, Rhodiola, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Performance-Enhancing Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review