Auto detecting deliveries in elite cricket fast bowlers using microsensors and machine learning
Open accessAbstract
Cricket fast bowlers are at a high risk of injury occurrence, which has previously been shown to be correlated to bowling workloads. This study aimed to develop and test an algorithm that can automatically, reliably and accurately detect bowling deliveries. Inertial sensor data from a Catapult OptimEye S5 wearable device was collected from both national and international level fast bowlers (n = 35) in both training and matches, at various intensities. A machine-learning based approach was used to develop the algorithm. Outputs were compared with over 20,000 manually recorded events. A high Matthews correlation coefficient (r = 0.945) showed very good agreement between the automatically detected bowling deliveries and manually recorded ones. The algorithm was found to be both sensitive and specific in training (96.3%, 98.3%) and matches (99.6%, 96.9%), respectively. Rare falsely classified events were typically warm-up deliveries or throws preceded by a run. Inertial sensors data processed by a machine-learning based algorithm provide a valid tool to automatically detect bowling events, whilst also providing the opportunity to look at performance metrics associated with fast bowling. This offers the possibility to better monitor bowling workloads across a range of intensities to mitigate injury risk potential and maximise performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional methods of quantifying the physical demands of fast bowlers are prone to inaccuracies through self-reporting and assumptions of uniform intensity.
“Traditional methods of quantifying the physical demands of fast bowlers, (counting the number of balls and/or overs bowled), are prone to inaccuracies through self-reporting and assumptions of uniform intensity [33].”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Accelerometers are sensitive in the automated detection of bowling counts during training and competition.
“and are sensitive in the automated detection of bowling counts during training and competition [6, 33]”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
MEMS devices have demonstrated a high level of sensitivity (>96% accuracy) in automatically detecting fast bowling deliveries.
“Furthermore, MEMS devices have demonstrated a high level of sensitivity (>96% accuracy) in automatically detecting fast bowling deliveries [6, 33].”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format.
Petersen, C. J., Pyne, D., Dawson, B., Portus, M., & Kellett, A. (2010) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410903348665 · Cited by 182 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In cricket, GPS units have been used to track the movements of players across all three formats of the game to develop an understanding of the difference in workloads and intensities between the formats (Petersen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodRelationships Between Fast Bowling Technique and Ball Release Speed in Cricket
Worthington, P. J., King, M. A., & Ranson, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Biomechanics · doi:10.1123/jab.29.1.78 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationMcNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Chapman, P., Naughton, G., & Farhart, P. (2015) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0062 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Quantifying positional movement patterns in Twenty20 cricket
Petersen, C., Pyne, D. B., Portus, M. R., & Dawson, B. (2009) · International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport · doi:10.1080/24748668.2009.11868474 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bray, J. W., Towlson, C., Hayes, S. C., & Fogarty, M. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317692 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jowitt, H. K., Durussel, J., Brandon, R., & King, M.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jowitt, Hannah K
- ORCID
- King, Mark
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-02-26
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 767-772
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W3008135622
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- cricket fast bowling, inertial sensors, wearable sensors, machine learning classification, injury risk, performance indicators
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Cricket Sport, Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Risk Assessment, Geographic Information Systems, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review