Cited by 37Sports Dynamics and BiomechanicsContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsSports Performance and Training

Auto detecting deliveries in elite cricket fast bowlers using microsensors and machine learning

Open access
Jowitt, Hannah K, Durussel, Jérôme, Brandon, Raphael, King, Mark·2020·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Cricket fast bowlers are at a high risk of injury occurrence, which has previously been shown to be correlated to bowling workloads. This study aimed to develop and test an algorithm that can automatically, reliably and accurately detect bowling deliveries. Inertial sensor data from a Catapult OptimEye S5 wearable device was collected from both national and international level fast bowlers (n = 35) in both training and matches, at various intensities. A machine-learning based approach was used to develop the algorithm. Outputs were compared with over 20,000 manually recorded events. A high Matthews correlation coefficient (r = 0.945) showed very good agreement between the automatically detected bowling deliveries and manually recorded ones. The algorithm was found to be both sensitive and specific in training (96.3%, 98.3%) and matches (99.6%, 96.9%), respectively. Rare falsely classified events were typically warm-up deliveries or throws preceded by a run. Inertial sensors data processed by a machine-learning based algorithm provide a valid tool to automatically detect bowling events, whilst also providing the opportunity to look at performance metrics associated with fast bowling. This offers the possibility to better monitor bowling workloads across a range of intensities to mitigate injury risk potential and maximise performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2020.1734308

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jowitt, H. K., Durussel, J., Brandon, R., & King, M.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jowitt, Hannah K
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2020-02-26
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
767-772
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W3008135622
Cited by
37
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
cricket fast bowling, inertial sensors, wearable sensors, machine learning classification, injury risk, performance indicators
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Cricket Sport, Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Risk Assessment, Geographic Information Systems, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review