Cited by 47Sports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSports injuries and prevention

Quantifying positional movement patterns in Twenty20 cricket

Petersen, C., Pyne, D.B., Portus, M.R., Dawson, B.·2009·International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport

Abstract

The time-motion characteristics of five cricket positions (Batsmen, Fast bowlers, Fielders, Spin bowlers, Wicketkeepers) were quantified during four State Twenty20 (T20) cricket matches. A total of 18 different players were monitored over 30 innings. Several time motion characteristics were quantified using portable 5Hz global positioning system (GPS) units. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) were used to describe the data while the effect size statistic was used to determine the magnitude of difference in patterns of movement between positions. T20 cricketers covered between 6.4 - 8.5 km, with 0.1 – 0.7 km of this distance spent sprinting during an 80 min fielding innings. Fast Bowlers covered 8.5 ± 1.5 km; sprinted 42 ± 8 times, mean sprint distance was 17 ± 2m and total sprinting distance was 0.7 ± 0.2 km. Wicketkeepers covered 6.4 ± 0.7 km; sprinted 5 ± 2 times, mean sprint distance was 10 ± 3m and total sprinting distance was 62 ± 44m. While batting (30 min) players covered ~2.5 km; sprinted 12 ± 5 times, mean sprint distance was 14 ± 3m and total sprinting distance was 160 ± 80m. Fast bowlers and fielders have substantially greater physical demands than spin bowlers and wicketkeepers in T20 cricket.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24748668.2009.11868474

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing time-motion analysis literature provides insights into the physical demands of T20 cricket but does not describe movements and actions at a fielding position-specific level nor provide insight into tactical performance.

    “While there is an existing body of literature involving time-motion analysis (Petersen et al., 2009;Petersen et al., 2010;Sholto-Douglas et al., 2020) which provides some interesting insights into the physical demands of T20 cricket, these findings do not describe movements and actions at a fielding position-specific level nor provide an insight into tactical performance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, C., Pyne, D. B., Portus, M. R., & Dawson, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Department of Physiology, Australian Institute of Sport.
  • Sports Science Sports Medicine Unit, Cricket Australia.
Venue
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport
Published
2009-08
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
165-170
ISSN
  • 1474-8185 (ISSN-L)
  • 2474-8668
OpenAlex
W2203204037
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
T20 cricket, player movement patterns, sprinting distance, physical demands, fast bowlers, fielders, batsmen, GPS tracking, time and motion study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review