Cited by 45Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The effect of the magical hour on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in traumatic childbirth: a clinical trial

Abdollahpour, Sedigheh, Khosravi, Ahmad, Bolbolhaghighi, Nahid·2016·Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the influence of the magical first hour after birth on post-traumatic stress in traumatic childbirths. Background: Traumatic childbirth with disturbing memories can have negative impacts on the mental health of postpartum mothers. Due to the growing trend of post-traumatic stress, the emphasis of recent research is on the identification and prevention of this kind of stress and the enhancement of maternal mental health. Methods: In this randomised clinical trial, which was carried out with 84 newly delivered mothers who were diagnosed with traumatic childbirth, participants were first randomly assigned into intervention (magical first hour) and control groups. Then, the nine instinctive stages were implemented to the intervention group while the control group received routine after-birth procedures. Then, using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), stress was measured at three intervals of 2 weeks, 4–6 weeks and 3 months after childbirth. The collected data were analysed using a mixed analysis of variance. Results: The mean total score of post-traumatic stress in the intervention group was 16.83 ± 1.1 and in the control group 21.04 ± 1.1, which showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). With the passage of time, the average scores of post-traumatic stress in both groups decreased and no interaction was observed between time and intervention. Conclusion: Implementation of the magical hour stages is recommended as a preventive and therapeutic guideline for relieving post-traumatic stress in women with traumatic childbirth experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02646838.2016.1185773

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdollahpour, S., Khosravi, A., & Bolbolhaghighi, N.
Affiliations
Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Bolbolhaghighi, Nahid
Venue
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Published
2016-07-13
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
403-412
ISSN
  • 0264-6838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-672X
OpenAlex
W2463826116
Cited by
45
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deputy of Research and Technology of the Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (9, 418)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
traumatic birth, post-traumatic stress disorder, postpartum care, stress prevention, Impact of Event Scale-Revised

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review