The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimates of dietary exposure to aluminium
Abstract
Daily intakes of aluminium were estimated for 14 age-sex groups based on the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Total Diet Study dietary exposure model. The aluminium content of the core foods of the FDA Total Diet Study were determined by analyses, recipe calculation, or literature values and coupled with information on food consumption from the 1987-88 US Department of Agriculture Nationwide Food Consumption Survey. Estimates of aluminium intakes ranged from 0.7 mg/day for 6-11-month-old infants to 11.5 mg/day for 14-16-year-old males. Average intakes for adult men and women were 8-9 and 7 mg/day, respectively. The major contributors to daily intake of aluminium were foods with aluminium-containing food additives, e.g. grain products and processed cheese.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Daily intakes of aluminium in humans from food range from 3.4 to 9 mg/day.
“Daily intakes of Al in humans from food range from 3.4 to 9 mg/day (Pennington and Schoen, 1995; Biego et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2014).”
From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Pennington and Schoen, 1995
The use of aluminium cookware, utensils and wrappings can increase the amount of aluminium in food.
“The use of Al cookware, utensils and wrappings can increase the amount of Al in food (Liukkonen-Lilja and Piepponen 1992; Pennington and Schoen, 1995).”
From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Pennington and Schoen, 1995
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Allegrini M., 1981, Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 64, 1111
- 1993, Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration, Government Printing Office, 52
- 10.1159/000175356 · DOI
- 10.1016/0278-6915(83)90105-9 · DOI
- 1990, Nationwide Food Consumption Survey (1987–88), Individual Intakes, 3 Days
- Jones J. W., 1985, Spectrochimica Acta, 40, 263, 10.1016/0584-8547(85)80029-X · DOI
- 10.1039/an9820700353 · DOI
- Krueger, G. L., Clark, R. A. and Widner, E. M. 1985.Effects of Aluminum‐Containing Compounds in Mammals: A Critical Review of the Literature Published (or Made Available) in 1984, 20–42. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.
- Pennington J. A. T., 1982, Documentation for the Revised Total Diet Study: Food List and Diets
- Pennington J. A. T., 1983, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 82, 166, 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)00058-4 · DOI
- Pennington J. A. T., 1988, Food Additives and Contaminants, 5, 161, 10.1080/02652038809373696 · DOI · Paper page
- Pennington J. A. T., 1992, Journal of Nutrition Education, 24, 173, 10.1016/S0022-3182(12)81149-6 · DOI
- Pennington J. A. T., 1992, Food Additives and Contaminants, 9, 253, 10.1080/02652039209374069 · DOI
- Pennington J. A. T., 1992, Appendices for the 1990 Revision of the Food and Drug Administration's Total Diet Study
- Pennington J. A. T., 1987, Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 70, 772
- Pennington J. A. T., 1989, Aluminum in Health, A Critical Review, 67
- Ward M. K., 1991, Alzheimer's Disease and the Environment, 106
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human Health Risk Assessment for Aluminium, Aluminium Oxide, and Aluminium Hydroxide
Krewski, D., Yokel, R. A., Nieboer, E., Borchelt, D., Cohen, J., Harry, J., Kacew, S., Lindsay, J., Mahfouz, A. M., & Rondeau, V. (2007) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400701597766 · Cited by 998
Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects
Igbokwe, I. O., Igwenagu, E., & Igbokwe, N. A. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2019-0007 · Cited by 395
“…and fragility, shortening of red blood cell life span due to eryptotic and oncotic injuries, and inadequate iron utilization (Zatta et al., 1989; Perez et al., 2001; Bazzoni et al., 2005; Vittori et al., 2002; Niemoeller et al., 2006; Hernández et al., 2008; Sadhana, 2011; Vota et al., 2012;…”
BackgroundAluminum toxicokinetics regarding infant diet and vaccinations.
Keith, L. S., Jones, D. E., & Chou, C.-H. S. J. (2002) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00165-2 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennington, J. A. T., & Schoen, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US)
- Venue
- Food Additives and Contaminants
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-128
- ISSN
- 0265-203X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008920647
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Additives & Contaminants (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Keywords
- total diet study, dietary intake, processed cheese, cereal products, age and sex groups
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aluminum, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet Surveys, Female, Food Analysis, Food Contamination, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
