The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies
Open accessAbstract
Older adults’ engagement with information communication technology (ICT) can enhance their wellbeing and quality of life. However, older adults continue to lag behind their younger cohorts’ ICT use, and many remain unconnected. While policy and strategy has tended to focus on the need to equip older adults with technology skills and improve their digital literacy, the relationship between skills adoption of technologies is not straightforward. This study sought to investigate via case study the diverse digital experiences and motivations of 10 older adults within a regional area of Queensland, Australia. Through questerviews, the integration of questionnaire items (on technology acceptance models) and semi-structured interview questions, the participants relayed their frustrations, successes, strategies, tools and connections they needed in order to use ICT more extensively and more effectively. What these data showed were older adults with varying degrees of ICT skills and diverse motivations, from complete yet passionate beginner, through to others who were considered savvy users. Higher levels of digital skills and literacy did not necessarily equate to increased engagement with ICT for all participants in this study, rather a range of motivational processes mattered. Implications are considered for technology training and learning for older adults.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This may be particularly evident when there are differences in computer literacy within the older adult population, with some just beginning to use digital technologies and others having kept up with the latest technologies (Tyler et al., 2020).”
From User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as Tyler et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249633 · Cited by 2,891
Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis
Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Education and Practice · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100 · Cited by 1,994
Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006 · Cited by 597
Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use
Shapira, N., Barak, A., & Gal, I. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860601086546 · Cited by 501
White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L. G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C., & Box, T. L. (2002) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860220142422 · Cited by 387
Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study
Renaud, K., & van Biljon, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology · doi:10.1145/1456659.1456684 · Cited by 378
Jensen, J. D., King, A. J., Davis, L. A., & Guntzviller, L. M. (2010) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/0898264310366161 · Cited by 181
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1258/1355819041403268 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0002716211423363 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446249215.n22 · DOI
- Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
- Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0192119 · DOI
- 10.1093/geroni/igy002 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444816667135 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1080/03601271003715962 · DOI
- 10.5897/AJBM11.1966 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.2333 · DOI
- 10.1148/rg.245045020 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.735 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.021 · DOI
- 10.1093/geronb/gbu018 · DOI · Paper page
- Creswell J.W., 2014, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13607863.2017.1358354 · DOI
- Feist H., 2013, Australian population & migration research centre policy brief, 1, 1
- Fox S., 2004, Older Americans and the internet
- Frissen V., 2005, E-merging media: communication and the media economy of the future, 271
- Gilhooly M.L., 2010, Gerontechnology, 9, 283
- Guest G., 2011, Applied thematic analysis
- 10.1080/03601277.2016.1205425 · DOI
- 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.166 · DOI
- 10.1080/03601270600685677 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818787348 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2190/ET.39.4.e · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.017 · DOI
- Kvale S., 2009, Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing
- 10.3390/healthcare7030086 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0144686X18000326 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/gny113 · DOI · Paper page
- Newman L.A., 2010, The Journal of Community Informatics, 6, 10.15353/joci.v9i2.3162 · DOI
- 10.1080/13645570701401305 · DOI
- 10.1177/0733464815624151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0002764218777572 · DOI
- 10.1177/0741713605277372 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_33 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/gny036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.im.2006.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0733464815609440 · DOI
- 10.1080/01924788.2018.1428472 · DOI
- Tyler M.A., 2015, Proceedings of the 44th Annual Standing Conference on University Teaching and Research in the Education of Adults (SCUTREA) 2015, 380
- 10.2196/jmir.6853 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/30036540 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00634.x · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/glu105 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.1880 · DOI
- 10.1177/1555412015601757 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
Lim, K. J., McGuckian, T. B., Cole, M. H., Duckworth, J., & Wilson, P. H. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-5 · Cited by 5
“This may be particularly evident when there are differences in computer literacy within the older adult population, with some just beginning to use digital technologies and others having kept up with the latest technologies (Tyler et al., 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyler, M., De George-Walker, L., & Simic, V.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Department of Consumer & Community Engagement, Planning Engagement & Reform, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia;
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tyler, Mark
- Venue
- Studies in the Education of Adults
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-03-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-194
- ISSN
- 0266-0830 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-9833
- OpenAlex
- W3009954177
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Studies in the Education of Adults (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- older adults, information and communication technologies, digital literacy, technology adoption, motivation, technological competence, digital inclusion, technology training, well-being, quality of life, technology acceptance model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review