Cited by 71Technology Use by Older AdultsDigital literacy in educationAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies

Open access
Tyler, Mark, De George-Walker, Linda, Simic, Veronika·2020·Studies in the Education of Adults

Abstract

Older adults’ engagement with information communication technology (ICT) can enhance their wellbeing and quality of life. However, older adults continue to lag behind their younger cohorts’ ICT use, and many remain unconnected. While policy and strategy has tended to focus on the need to equip older adults with technology skills and improve their digital literacy, the relationship between skills adoption of technologies is not straightforward. This study sought to investigate via case study the diverse digital experiences and motivations of 10 older adults within a regional area of Queensland, Australia. Through questerviews, the integration of questionnaire items (on technology acceptance models) and semi-structured interview questions, the participants relayed their frustrations, successes, strategies, tools and connections they needed in order to use ICT more extensively and more effectively. What these data showed were older adults with varying degrees of ICT skills and diverse motivations, from complete yet passionate beginner, through to others who were considered savvy users. Higher levels of digital skills and literacy did not necessarily equate to increased engagement with ICT for all participants in this study, rather a range of motivational processes mattered. Implications are considered for technology training and learning for older adults.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02660830.2020.1731058

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1258/1355819041403268 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0002716211423363 · DOI
  4. 10.4135/9781446249215.n22 · DOI
  5. Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
  6. Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192119 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/geroni/igy002 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/1461444816667135 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.015 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/03601271003715962 · DOI
  12. 10.5897/AJBM11.1966 · DOI
  13. 10.2196/jmir.2333 · DOI
  14. 10.1148/rg.245045020 · DOI
  15. 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.735 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.021 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/geronb/gbu018 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Creswell J.W., 2014, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
  19. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/13607863.2017.1358354 · DOI
  21. Feist H., 2013, Australian population & migration research centre policy brief, 1, 1
  22. Fox S., 2004, Older Americans and the internet
  23. Frissen V., 2005, E-merging media: communication and the media economy of the future, 271
  24. Gilhooly M.L., 2010, Gerontechnology, 9, 283
  25. Guest G., 2011, Applied thematic analysis
  26. 10.1080/03601277.2016.1205425 · DOI
  27. 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.166 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/03601270600685677 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1461444818787348 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.2190/ET.39.4.e · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.017 · DOI
  32. Kvale S., 2009, Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing
  33. 10.3390/healthcare7030086 · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S0144686X18000326 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/geront/gny113 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Newman L.A., 2010, The Journal of Community Informatics, 6, 10.15353/joci.v9i2.3162 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/13645570701401305 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0733464815624151 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1177/0002764218777572 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/0741713605277372 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_33 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/geront/gny036 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.im.2006.02.001 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/0733464815609440 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/01924788.2018.1428472 · DOI
  46. Tyler M.A., 2015, Proceedings of the 44th Annual Standing Conference on University Teaching and Research in the Education of Adults (SCUTREA) 2015, 380
  47. 10.2196/jmir.6853 · DOI
  48. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.2307/30036540 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00634.x · DOI
  53. 10.1093/gerona/glu105 · DOI
  54. 10.2196/jmir.1880 · DOI
  55. 10.1177/1555412015601757 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Tyler, M., De George-Walker, L., & Simic, V.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Department of Consumer & Community Engagement, Planning Engagement & Reform, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia;
  • Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Tyler, Mark
Venue
Studies in the Education of Adults
Published
2020-03-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
175-194
ISSN
  • 0266-0830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9833
OpenAlex
W3009954177
Cited by
71
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Studies in the Education of Adults (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
older adults, information and communication technologies, digital literacy, technology adoption, motivation, technological competence, digital inclusion, technology training, well-being, quality of life, technology acceptance model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review