Cited by 89Resilience and Mental HealthFoucault, Power, and EthicsGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions for resilience in educational settings: challenging policy discourses of risk and vulnerability

Ecclestone, Kathryn, Lewis, Lydia·2014·Journal of Education Policy

Abstract

‘Resilience’ has become a popular goal in research, social policy, intervention design and implementation. Reinforced by its conceptual and political slipperiness, resilience has become a key construct in school-based, universal interventions that aim to develop it as part of social and emotional competence or emotional well-being. Drawing on a case study of a popular behavioural programme used widely in British and American primary schools, this paper uses a critical social understanding that combines bio-scientific and social constructionist ideas in order to evaluate key challenges for policy, research and practice framed around resilience. The paper argues that although critical social perspectives illuminate important contemporary manifestations of old problems with behavioural interventions, and challenge narrow, moralising definitions of ‘risk’ and ‘vulnerability’, they coalesce with behavioural perspectives in a search for better state-sponsored responses to the shared question of how to build resilience amongst ‘vulnerable’ groups and individuals. Instead, we argue that critical sociologists need to resist responses that offer more sophisticated behavioural interventions and generate new forms of governance and subjectivity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02680939.2013.806678

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such programmes rely heavily on trust-based, relationship-driven engagement, which serves as a foundation for meaningful self-reflection, behavioural change and goal setting.

    “Such programmes rely heavily on trust-based, relationship-driven engagement, which serves as a foundation for meaningful self-reflection, behavioural change and goal setting (Bailey et al., 2018; Ecclestone & Lewis, 2013).”
  • When embedded in supportive, trauma-informed environments, these dual-pronged approaches can help pupils form new narratives about themselves that are more agentic, hopeful and connected to future aspirations.

    “When embedded in supportive, trauma-informed environments, these dual-pronged approaches can help pupils form new narratives about themselves, narratives that are more agentic, hopeful and connected to future aspirations (Ecclestone & Lewis, 2013; Jones & Lavallee, 2009).”
  • Discourses of "resilience" can sometimes obscure the structural injustices and systemic harms experienced by displaced individuals if interpreted uncritically.

    “However, it is equally important to critically acknowledge that discourses of “resilience” can sometimes obscure the structural injustices and systemic harms experienced by displaced individuals if interpreted uncritically (Ecclestone and Lewis 2014).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00293.x · DOI
  2. Bacon Nicola, 2010, The State of Happiness: Can Public Policy Shape People’s Wellbeing and Resilience?
  3. Bailey Laura, 2010, Promoting Emotional Resilience in Children and Young People
  4. Better Regulation Task Force, 2000, Protecting Vulnerable People
  5. 10.1080/15017410600914329 · DOI
  6. Brooks David, 2011, The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character and Achievement
  7. 10.1017/S1474746408004582 · DOI
  8. 10.4324/9780203299968 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-1-349-24678-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/02671522.2012.690242 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/02680939.2010.513745 · DOI
  12. Claxton Guy, 2002, Building Learning Power
  13. Coaffee J., 2009, Terrorism, Risk and the Global City – Towards Urban Resilience
  14. 10.1080/03054980902934548 · DOI
  15. Craig Carol, 2007, The Potential Dangers of a Systematic, Explicit Approach to Teaching Social and Emotional Skills
  16. 10.1080/02667360601154717 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/02680939.2010.516841 · DOI
  18. DfES, 2005, Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning Strategy for Schools: Guidance for Teachers
  19. 10.1080/02671522.2012.690240 · DOI
  20. Domitrovich Celene, 2004, PATHS Preschool/Kindergarten Instructor’s Manual
  21. Ecclestone Kathryn, 2008, The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education
  22. 10.1017/S1474746406003514 · DOI
  23. Friedli Lynne, 2009, Mental Health, Resilience and Inequalities
  24. Friedli Lynne, 2011, What We Know About: Mental Health and Wellbeing, What Makes us Healthy? The Asset Approach in Practice: Evidence, Action, Evaluation
  25. Furedi Frank, 2004, Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00629.x · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s10896-007-9065-3 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1080/01425692.2011.547305 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/03054980902934597 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S1474746408004612 · DOI
  31. Humphrey Neil, 2009, Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) Programme in Secondary Schools: National Evaluation
  32. Huppert Felicia, 2007, Presentation to the All-party Group Seminar ‘Well-Being in the classroom’, 23 October 2007
  33. 10.5040/9781849662284 · DOI
  34. Johnson M., 2007, Subject to Change: New Thinking on the Curriculum
  35. Kavanagh Josephine, 2009, Inequalities and the Mental Health of Young People: A Systematic Review of Secondary School-based Cognitive Behavioural Interventions
  36. 10.1177/10634266040120020101 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/00461520.2011.610678 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00216.x · DOI
  40. 10.1177/0011392111426650 · DOI
  41. Layard Richard, 2005, Happiness: Lessons from a New Science
  42. Layard Richard, 2009, A Good Childhood: Searching for Values in a Competitive Age
  43. 10.1080/13632750903073509 · DOI
  44. Lewis Lydia, 2012, Community Development Journal Mental Health Special Issue, 47, 522
  45. McLaughlin Kenneth, 2011, Surviving Identity: The Rise of the ‘Survivor’ in Contemporary Society
  46. 10.1080/03050068.2011.637760 · DOI
  47. Mguni Nina, 2010, Taking the Temperature of Local Communities, the Wellbeing and Resilience Measure (Warm)
  48. 10.1017/S1474746408004594 · DOI
  49. Morrison Gutman Leslie, 2010, Change in Wellbeing from Childhood to Adolescence: Risk and Resilience. Research Report
  50. 10.1080/02671522.2012.690237 · DOI
  51. Nolan James, 1998, The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century’s End
  52. Palmer Susan, 2006, Toxic Childhood: How Modern Life is Damaging Our Children
  53. Peterson C., 2004, Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
  54. 10.1080/02671522.2012.690244 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/CBO9780511752872.013 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/1367626032000068145 · DOI
  57. Seligman Martin, 2011, Flourish: A New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being – and How to Achieve Them
  58. Sharples Jonathan, 2007, Well-being in the Classroom, Report on the All-party Parliamentary Committee, October 27th 2007
  59. Sodha Sonia, 2009, A Stitch in Time: Tackling Educational Disengagement
  60. Stoker Gerry, 2010, Motivation, Behaviour and the Microfoundations of Public Services
  61. Sullivan Helen, 2011, When Tomorrow Comes: The Future of Public Services, Report of the University of Birmingham/DEMOS Policy Commission on ‘the Future of Public services’
  62. 10.2307/j.ctt1t89923 · DOI
  63. Weare K., 2004, Developing the Emotionally Literate School
  64. 10.4324/9780203815540 · DOI
  65. Wilkinson Richard, 2009, The Spirit Level: Why more Equal Societies Almost Always do Better
  66. Wright Katie, 2011, The Rise of Therapeutic Society: Psychological Knowledge and the Contradictions of Cultural Change

Metadata

Authors
Ecclestone, K., & Lewis, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Ecclestone, Kathryn
Venue
Journal of Education Policy
Published
2013-07-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
195-216
ISSN
  • 0268-0939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5106
OpenAlex
W2030357667
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Education Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
resilience, school-based intervention, behavioral interventions, risk and vulnerability, social constructionism, socioemotional skills, emotional well-being, elementary school, education policy, governance, subjectivity, critical sociology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review