CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 435Microfinance and Financial InclusionGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsLivestock Management and Performance Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self‐help groups in India

Open access
Swain, Ranjula Bali, Wallentin, Fan Yang·2009·International Review of Applied Economics
DOI 10.1080/02692170903007540
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Microfinance programmes like the Self Help Bank Linkage Program in India have been increasingly promoted for their positive economic impact and the belief that they empower women. However, only a few studies rigorously examine the link between microfinance and women’s empowerment. This article contributes to this discussion by arguing that women’s empowerment takes place when women challenge the existing social norms and culture, to effectively improve their well‐being. It empirically validates this hypothesis by using quasi‐experimental household sample data collected for five states in India for 2000 and 2003. A general model is estimated by employing appropriate techniques to treat the ordinal variables in order to estimate the impact of the Self Help Group (SHG) on women’s empowerment for 2000 and 2003. The results strongly demonstrate that on average, there is a significant increase in the empowerment of women in the SHG members group. No such significant change is observed however, for the members of the control group. The elegance of the result lies in the fact that the group of SHG participants show clear evidence of a significant and higher empowerment, while allowing for the possibility that some members might have been more empowered than others.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02692170903007540

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ashraf N., 2006, Working Paper
  2. Bali Swain R., 2007, Dialogue, Appui au Developpement Autonome, 61
  3. Frankenberg E., 2001, FCND Discussion Paper, no. 113
  4. Jöreskog K.G., 2002, Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL
  5. 2001, A World Bank Policy Research Report

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 433

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Swain, Ranjula Bali
ORCID
Swain, Ranjula Bali
Venue
International Review of Applied Economics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
541-556
ISSN
  • 0269-2171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3486
DOI
10.1080/02692170903007540
OpenAlex
W2154775467
Cited by
435
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Review of Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Livestock Management and Performance Improvement
Keywords
microfinance, women's empowerment, self-help groups, social norms, household welfare, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review