The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations
Abstract
The aim of the present paper is to examine the contribution of evaluative conditioning (EC) to attitude formation theory in social psychology. This aim is pursued on two fronts. First, evaluative conditioning is analysed for its relevance to social psychological research. We show that conditioned attitudes can be acquired through simple co-occurrences of a neutral and a valenced stimulus. Moreover, we argue that conditioned attitudes are not confined to direct contact with a valenced stimulus, but can be formed and dynamically reformed indirectly, through association chains. Second, social research is examined in an effort to identify evaluative learning mechanisms. We suggest that several important phenomena in social psychology (e.g., ingroup favouritism, prejudice, name letter effect) are at least partly due to simple mechanisms of evaluative learning. The implications for attitude formation theory and for applied settings are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69 · Cited by 1,727
De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853 · Cited by 1,181
A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.1.61 · Cited by 723
What's in a name: implicit self-esteem and the automatic self
Koole, S. L., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.669 · Cited by 424
Cited by
Associative Attitude Learning: A Closer Look at Evidence and How It Relates to Attitude Models
Corneille, O., & Stahl, C. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318763261 · Cited by 129
Walther, E., & Nagengast, B. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.454 · Cited by 82
Self-citationThe derived generalization of thought suppression
Hooper, N., Saunders, J., & McHugh, L. (2010) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.38.2.160 · Cited by 39
Moran, T., Hughes, S., Hussey, I., Vadillo, M. A., Olson, M. A., Aust, F., Bading, K., Balas, R., Benedict, T., Corneille, O., et al. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620968526 · Cited by 27
Examining the trade‐off between confidence and optimism in future forecasts
Stavrova, O., & Evans, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2087 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Walther, E., Nagengast, B., & Trasselli, C.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-196
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2113067026
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699930441000274
- The paper
- Walther, E., Nagengast, B., & Trasselli, C. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.