CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 246Emotion and Mood RecognitionEmotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRIEF REPORT

Hewig, Johannes, Hagemann, Dirk, Seifert, Jan, Gollwitzer, Mario, Naumann, Ewald, Bartussek, Dieter·2005·Cognition & Emotion
DOI 10.1080/02699930541000084
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the past decade several film sets for the induction of emotions have been developed. These film sets mainly consist of emotional clips from feature films. Since the neutral stimuli in these sets were abstract scenes, documentary or television excerpts, the aim of the present study was to develop a set that includes comparable neutral stimuli from commercially available feature films that match the emotional ones in their content. Furthermore, the capacity of the emotional film clips to elicit a specific target emotion was evaluated. Four neutral clips were selected and shown to 38 subjects, together with 16 emotional clips from earlier studies on emotion induction. Four clips were selected to elicit anger, and three clips to elicit each of the target emotions disgust, fear, sadness, and amusement. The participants rated their feelings on 21 emotion scales. Cluster analysis confirmed the six a priori groups of films. ANOVA further revealed that the four neutral clips, were rated neutral on the valence and low on the intensity dimension. Most of the emotional film clips primarily elicited their respective target emotion. In summary, at least two clips for each target emotion were able to elicit that emotion selectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699930541000084

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lueck H. E., 1983, Emotionspsychologie. Ein Handbuch in Schluesselbegriffen, 188
  2. Ulich D., 1998, Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Paedagogische Psychologie, 30, 89

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–245 of 245

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hewig, J., Hagemann, D., Seifert, J., Gollwitzer, M., Naumann, E., & Bartussek, D.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-11
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
1095-1109
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
DOI
10.1080/02699930541000084
OpenAlex
W2473636365
Cited by
246
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotion induction, film clips, emotional stimuli, neutral stimuli, anger, disgust, fear, sadness, amusements, valence, emotional intensity, stimulus selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review