Cited by 202Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultural and gender differences in emotion regulation: Relation to depression

Abstract

In the last decade, studies have shown that the use of specific emotion regulation strategies contributes to an increased risk for depression. Past research, however, has overlooked potential cultural and gender differences in emotion regulation. The present study examined the relation between the use of emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms among college students in two different cultures (n=380 in Seoul, Korea; n=384 in Miami, USA). Koreans, compared with American students, reported more frequent use of brooding, whereas Americans reported more anger suppression than Koreans. Women were more likely than men to use both types of rumination (i.e., reflective pondering and brooding) and anger suppression in both countries, but these gender differences disappeared once levels of depressive symptoms were controlled for. In addition, the association between the use of reappraisal and depressive symptoms was significantly stronger in the Korean compared to the US sample. In contrast, the association between anger suppression and depressive symptoms was significantly stronger in the American compared to the Korean sample. These findings highlight the importance of considering the role of culture in emotion regulation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2013.792244

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2006, Epidemiological surveys in mental diseases in Korea
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.301 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Kwon, H., Yoon, K. L., Joormann, J., & Kwon, J.-H.
Affiliations
  • Korea University (KR)
  • University of Maine (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Kwon, Jung-Hye
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2013-08
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
769-782
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2151247201
Cited by
202
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
emotion regulation, depression, cultural differences, gender differences, brooding, rumination, anger suppression, cognitive reappraisal, depressive symptoms, university students
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Asian, Black or African American, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depression, Emotions, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Repression, Psychology, Sex Characteristics, White People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review