Cited by 155Emotion and Mood RecognitionAesthetic Perception and AnalysisHumor Studies and Applications

Eliciting positive, negative and mixed emotional states: A film library for affective scientists

Open access
Samson, Andrea C., Kreibig, Sylvia D., Soderstrom, Blake, Wade, A. Ayanna, Gross, James J.·2016·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

We describe the creation of a film library designed for researchers interested in positive (amusing), negative (repulsive), mixed (amusing and repulsive) and neutral emotional states. Three hundred 20- to 33-second film clips videotaped by amateurs were selected from video-hosting websites and screened in laboratory studies by 75 female participants on self-reported amusement and repulsion (Experiments 1 and 2). On the basis of pre-defined cut-off values, 51 positive, 39 negative, 59 mixed and 50 neutral film clips were selected. These film clips were then presented to 411 male and female participants in a large online study to identify film clips that reliably induced the target emotions (Experiment 3). Depending on the goal of the study, researchers may choose positive, negative, mixed or neutral emotional film clips on the basis of Experiments 1 and 2 or Experiment 3 ratings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2015.1031089

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The positive and negative emotions in the Stanford film library mainly refer to amusement and disgust.

    “We collected the self-rating scores of these two emotions since the positive and negative emotions in Stanford film library23 mainly refer to amusement and disgust.”

    From A Multimodal Dataset for Mixed Emotion Recognition (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samson, A. C., Kreibig, S. D., Soderstrom, B., Wade, A. A., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Augustana College (US)
Corresponding author
Samson, Andrea C.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2015-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
827-856
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W1964448462
Cited by
155
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Schweizerische Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PA00P1_136380,PA00P1_139593,PBFRP1-127896,PBGEP1-125914)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
Keywords
emotion induction, amusements, repulsion, mixed emotions, positive emotions, negative emotions, neutral emotion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Pictures, Photic Stimulation, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review