Cited by 31Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Team members’ emotional displays as indicators of team functioning

Open access
Homan, Astrid C., Van Kleef, Gerben A., Sanchez-Burks, Jeffrey·2016·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

Emotions are inherent to team life, yet it is unclear how observers use team members' emotional expressions to make sense of team processes. Drawing on Emotions as Social Information theory, we propose that observers use team members' emotional displays as a source of information to predict the team's trajectory. We argue and show that displays of sadness elicit more pessimistic inferences regarding team dynamics (e.g., trust, satisfaction, team effectiveness, conflict) compared to displays of happiness. Moreover, we find that this effect is strengthened when the future interaction between the team members is more ambiguous (i.e., under ethnic dissimilarity; Study 1) and when emotional displays can be clearly linked to the team members' collective experience (Study 2). These studies shed light on when and how people use others' emotional expressions to form impressions of teams.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2015.1039494

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional expressions triggered stronger inferences when there was greater ambiguity surrounding the future trajectory of the team and when the emotional expressions were more likely to reflect team processes rather than dispositional tendencies toward positive or negative affectivity.

    “emotional expressions triggered stronger inferences when there was greater ambiguity surrounding the future trajectory of the team and when the emotional expressions were more likely to reflect team processes rather than dispositional tendencies toward positive or negative affectivity (Homan et al. 2016).”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Homan et al. 2016

  • Observers anticipated more cooperative interactions, higher satisfaction, greater interpersonal liking and trust, and less conflict when two team members expressed happiness through facial displays than when they expressed sadness.

    “In one study, observers anticipated more cooperative interactions, higher satisfaction, greater interpersonal liking and trust, and less conflict when two team members expressed happiness through facial displays than when they expressed sadness (Homan et al. 2016).”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Homan et al. 2016

  • Leaders could detect less friendly communication, discomfort, and heated emotional arguments in teams that experience intergroup bias.

    “In addition to observing these nonverbal processes, leaders could detect less friendly communication, discomfort, and heated emotional arguments in teams that experience intergroup bias (Dovidio et al., 2002;Homan, Van Kleef, & Sanchez-Burks, 2016;King & Ahmad, 2010;Thatcher, Jehn, & Zanutto, 2003;Zellmer-Bruhn, Maloney, Bhappu, & Salvador, 2008).”

    From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Homan, Van Kleef, & Sanchez-Burks, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., & Sanchez-Burks, J.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Homan, Astrid C.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2015-05-26
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
134-149
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2138018751
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
emotional display, team functioning, emotions as social information, sadness, happiness, team dynamics, trust, team satisfaction, team effectiveness, conflict, impression formation
MeSH terms
Emotions, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review