Cited by 5Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychometric Methodologies and TestingPhysical education and sports games research

Cross-cultural validation of the sport emotion questionnaire using elite hockey players: psychometric evidence from seven African countries

Open access
Quansah, Frank, Srem-Sai, Medina, Agormedah, Edmond Kwesi, Quansah, Nathaniel, Tannoubi, Amayra, Hagan, John Elvis, Schack, Thomas·2026·International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Abstract

The Sport Emotion Questionnaire (SEQ) is a popular measure of the emotions of athletes prior to a competition. Although several validation studies have assessed the SEQ’s psychometric properties, the findings have been inconsistent. The study examined the (a) structure of the SEQ, (b) variance contribution and discriminant analyses of the SEQ, and (c) reliability of the instrument across different groups of sports performers from seven African countries. A diverse convenient sample of sports performers (n = 423) completed the SEQ before competition. Using the confirmatory factor analysis across all countries, the five-factor first-order model best fits the data compared with the other proposed competing models. Further, the AVE values together with the loadings showed an adequate level of convergent and discriminant validity (based on internal structure), with all the average variance extracted (AVE) and heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) values larger than 0.50 and less than 0.90, respectively. Additionally, the reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions of the SEQ were greater than 0.70. Generally, the observed evidence supports the validity and reliability of the SEQ as a measure of expressed emotions by sports performers in a sports environment during competitions. Recommendations and conclusions are drawn from the findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1612197x.2024.2443634

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quansah, F., Srem-Sai, M., Agormedah, E. K., Quansah, N., Tannoubi, A., Hagan, J. E., & Schack, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Education, Winneba (GH)
  • University of Education
  • University of Cape Coast (GH)
  • University of Jendouba (TN)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Hagan, John Elvis
Venue
International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2024-12-29
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
213-231
ISSN
  • 1557-251X (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-197X
OpenAlex
W4405916118
Cited by
4
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Funders
APC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research
Keywords
pre-competition emotions, athletes, hockey players, cross-cultural validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, reliability statistics, African athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review