The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentional control moderates the relationship between social anxiety and selective attentional responding to negative social information: evidence from objective measures of attentional processes
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive theories of social anxiety implicate greater attention to negative social information in the development and maintenance of heightened social anxiety. Empirical evidence for this proposal, however, has been inconsistent. The aim of the current study was to examine the role of attentional control, which is one's ability to deploy attention to goal-relevant information as a potential moderator of the association between selective attentional responding to negative social information and social anxiety. Eighty-nine adults were recruited through Mechanical Turk platform and completed the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale as well as a novel paradigm designed to measure selective attentional responding to negative social information (angry faces) and attentional control. Attentional control was operationalised as the capacity to direct attention to the specified target stimuli. The results supported the hypothesis that attentional control plays this moderating role. Specifically, while participants with low levels of attentional control exhibited a positive association between social anxiety and selective attentional responding to negative social information, this association was eliminated among participants with high levels of attentional control. This finding may explain the heterogeneity of research findings in this area. Implications, limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher levels of attentional control have been shown to mitigate negative emotional symptoms associated with certain mental health risk factors.
“Higher levels of attentional control have also been shown to mitigate negative emotional symptoms associated with certain mental health risk factors (Mazidi et al., 2021; Thomas and Bardeen, 2020).”
From Investigating the links between objective social media use, attentional control, and psychological distress (2024) · cites this paper as Mazidi et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
Stein, M. B., & Stein, D. J. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60488-2 · Cited by 1,137
Attentional focus in social anxiety disorder: Potential for interactive processes
Schultz, L. T., & Heimberg, R. G. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.003 · Cited by 212
Taylor, C. T., Cross, K., & Amir, N. (2016) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.008 · Cited by 140
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.031 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/16506073.2012.666562 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.225 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/s13428-020-01383-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699931.2014.931275 · DOI
- 10.5127/jep.055916 · DOI
- 10.1111/bmsp.12028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-375096-9.00015-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02699931.2012.719490 · DOI
- 10.1080/10615800802449602 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00029-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10608-006-9096-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10862-017-9617-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-020-69910-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10608-006-9073-2 · DOI
- 10.1348/014466508X368856 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, C. N., Rudaizky, D., Mahalingham, T., & Clarke, P. J. F. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117400 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazidi, M., Grafton, B., Basanovic, J., & MacLeod, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Mazidi, Mahdi
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-08-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1440-1446
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W3189162613
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- osf.io
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (DE200101570,FL170100167)
- Australian Government (Australian Government International Research Training Program (IRTP))
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- social anxiety, attentional control, selective attention, angry faces, attentional bias, moderation, attentional deployment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety, Fear, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review