The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach
Open accessAbstract
The surprising convergence between independently developed appraisal theories of emotion elicitation and differentiation is briefly reviewed. It is argued that three problems are responsible for the lack of more widespread acceptance of such theories: (1) the criticism of excessive cognitivism raised by psychologists working on affective phenomena; (2) the lack of process orientation in linking appraisal to the complex unfolding of emotion episodes over time; and (3) the lack of consensus on the number and types of appraisal criteria between theorists in this domain. Although readers are referred to recent theoretical discussions and evidence from the neurosciences with respect to the first two issues, an empirical study using computerised experimentation is reported with respect to the third issue. Data obtained with an expert system based on Scherer's (1984a) “stimulus evaluation check” predictions show the feasibility of this approach in determining the number and types of appraisal criteria needed to explain emotion differentiation. It is suggested to use computer modelling and experimentation as a powerful tool to further theoretical development and collect pertinent data on the emotion-antecedent appraisal process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · Cited by 4,845
Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 · Cited by 2,379
Lazarus, R. S. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.124 · Cited by 1,402
(1984) · doi:10.4324/9781315798806-24 · Cited by 1,061
Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning.
Scherer, K. R., & Wallbott, H. G. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.310 · Cited by 959
Self-citationThe relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy.
Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. (1987) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699938708408361 · Cited by 832
Self-citationThe language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field
Johnson-laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1989) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699938908408075 · Cited by 736
Cited by
What are emotions? And how can they be measured?
Scherer, K. R. (2005) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018405058216 · Cited by 4,264
Self-citationAffect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications
Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2010.1 · Cited by 1,893
Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique.
Ekman, P. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.115.2.268 · Cited by 1,130
Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Response to Videos
Soleymani, M., Pantic, M., & Pun, T. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.37 · Cited by 722
Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling
Lewis, M. D. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0500004x · Cited by 618
Metadata
- Authors
- Scherer, K. R.
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 325-355
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2169439614
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699939308409192
- The paper
- Scherer, K. R. (1993). Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition & Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
