CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 162Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Injury Rehabilitation: A Goal-Setting Intervention Study

Evans, Lynne, Hardy, Lew·2002·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
DOI 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study examined the effects of a 5-week goal-setting intervention on athletes' rehabilitation adherence, self-efficacy, treatment efficacy, and the psychological response variables: dispirited and reorganization. Participants were matched across six variables and randomly assigned to one of three groups: goal-setting intervention, social support control, and control. The results confirmed some of the hypothesized effects of the goal-setting intervention: (a) athlete self-report of adherence showed the goal-setting group adhered significantly more to the rehabilitation program than the other two groups; (b) the goal-setting intervention resulted in significant group differences for self-efficacy (the goal-setting group having the highest level of self-efficacy); and (c) there was a significant increase across time for reorganization and decrease across time for dispirited (between specific time phases).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609025

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bandura , A. 1986 . Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory , Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall .
  2. 10.1080/08098130809478203 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1414 · DOI
  4. Lorr , M. and McNair , D. M. 1988 . Manual for the Profile of Mood States-Bipolar form , San Diego , CA : Educational and Industrial Testing Service .
  5. Taylor , A. H. and May , S. Development of a survey to assess athletes' sports injury rehabilitation beliefs [Abstract] . Proceedings of the Annual European Society for Health Psychology Conference . Brussels , Belgium.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Evans, L., & Hardy, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Wales Institute Cardiff (SG)
  • Bangor University (GB)
ORCID
Evans, Lynne
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-09
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
310-319
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
DOI
10.1080/02701367.2002.10609025
OpenAlex
W1978958459
Cited by
162
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
goal setting, injury rehabilitation, athletes, rehabilitation adherence, self-efficacy, treatment efficacy, restructuring, psychological response to injury, social support
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Athletic Injuries, Emotions, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Social Support, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review