Cited by 45Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Injury rehabilitation: a qualitative follow-up study

Evans, Lynne, Hardy, Lew·2002·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Abstract

The current qualitative follow-up study was conducted to enhance the interpretability and meaningfulness of the findings emerging from a 5-week goal-setting intervention study with injured athletes. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of 9 injured athletes, 3 from each of the three intervention study groups (goal-setting, social support control, and control), and cross-case summaries were inductively derived. The study highlighted the importance of individual difference variables, and the interaction of person and situational variables, including support from coaches and club, inability to train, weight gain, slowness of progress, physiotherapist support, and the importance of long-term outcome goals. Possible mechanisms for the observed effects of the goal-setting intervention included the effects of goal-setting on self-efficacy, attributions, perceptions of control, and attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609026

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evans and Hardy found participants who received a goal-setting intervention or a social support intervention had higher levels of perceived social support.

    “Evans and Hardy 37 found participants who received a goal-setting intervention or a social support intervention had higher levels of perceived social support.”
  • Goal setting as a technique to reduce psychological distress during rehabilitation was implemented in studies by Johnson and Evans and Hardy.

    “Incorporating goal setting as a technique to reduce psychological distress during the rehabilitation process was implemented in studies conducted by Johnson 38 and Evans and Hardy.36,37”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, L., & Hardy, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Wales Institute Cardiff (SG)
  • Bangor University (GB)
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2002-09
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
320-329
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2024300847
Cited by
45
References
54
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
injury rehabilitation, injured athletes, goal-setting intervention, social support, coach support, self-efficacy, attribution, perceived control, attention, individual differences, weight gain, sports injuries
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adult, Athletic Injuries, Attention, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Goals, Humans, Knee Injuries, Male, Rupture, Shoulder Dislocation, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review