The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE COMPONENT MODEL OF READING: SIMPLE VIEW OF READING MADE A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX
Abstract
The “Simple View of Reading” proposes that reading comprehension could be predicted by the product of decoding and linguistic comprehension. A somewhat modified version of this model suggests that the relationship between decoding and linguistic comprehension should be additive rather than multiplicative. This research is comprised of two studies. The first study compared the efficacy of the two formulas: (a) Reading Comprehension = Decoding ◊ Listening Comprehension, and (b) Reading Comprehension = Decoding + Listening Comprehension. The second study reported here explored whether adding another factor, speed of processing, to the Simple View of Reading formula improves its ability to predict reading comprehension. Forty third-grade children were administered word-attack and listening comprehension subtests from the Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery; the reading comprehension subtest from the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests; and a list of 40 letters to measure speed of processing. The results showed that Decoding and Listening Comprehension, whether multiplied with each other or added to each other, did not significantly alter the outcome. Furthermore, while 48% of the variance for Reading Comprehension could be explained by Decoding and Listening Comprehension, speed of naming the letters added another 10%. A modified model of reading is proposed which can be expressed by the formula, R = D ◊ C + S.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children
(1998) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/6023 · Cited by 5,337
Decoding, reading, and reading disability.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258600700104 · Cited by 3,972
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf00401799 · Cited by 2,956
Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.100.4.589 · Cited by 1,798
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n223 · Cited by 1,384
Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01067101 · Cited by 1,027
Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia
Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf01026919 · Cited by 663
Reconceptualizing the Development of Sight Word Reading and Its Relationship to Recoding
Ehri, L. C. (2017) · Reading Acquisition · doi:10.4324/9781351236904-5 · Cited by 566
Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children
Frith, U., & Snowling, M. (1983) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1983.tb00906.x · Cited by 503
The Impending Demise of the Discrepancy Formula
Aaron, P. G. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170518 · Cited by 243
Cited by
Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5 · Cited by 678
The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.411 · Cited by 510
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6 · Cited by 406
Should the Simple View of Reading Include a Fluency Component?
Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z · Cited by 406
Subgrouping Poor Readers on the Basis of Individual Differences in Reading-Related Abilities
Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221940303600208 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- R. Malatesha Joshi, P. G. A.
- Venue
- Reading Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-97
- ISSN
- 0270-2711 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0685
- OpenAlex
- W2141186207
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE COMPONENT MODEL OF READING: SIMPLE VIEW OF READING MADE A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02702710050084428
- The paper
- R. Malatesha Joshi, P. G. A. (2000). THE COMPONENT MODEL OF READING: SIMPLE VIEW OF READING MADE A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX. Reading Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.