The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Inverted Faces are Recognized: The Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition
Abstract
The identification of upright faces seems to involve a special sensitivity to "configural" information, the processing of which is less effective when the face is inverted. However the precise meaning of "configural" remains unclear. Five experiments are presented, which showed that the disruption of the processing of relational, rather than holistic, information largely determines the occurrence as well as the size of the face-inversion effect. In Experiment 1, faces could be identified either by unique combinations of local information (e.g. a specific eye colour plus hair colour) or by unique relational information (e.g. nose-mouth distance). The former showed no inversion effect, whereas the latter did. A combination of local and relational information (Experiment 2) again produced an inversion effect, although this effect was smaller than that found when only relational information was used. The results were replicated in Experiment 3 when differences in the brightness of local features were used instead of specific colour combinations. Experiment 4 used different retrieval conditions to distinguish relational from holistic processing, and demonstrated again that spatial relations between single features appeared to provide crucial information for face recognition. In Experiment 5, the importance of relational information was confirmed using faces that also varied in the shapes of local features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
Yin, R. K. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027474 · Cited by 2,624
Cited by
The many faces of configural processing
Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01903-4 · Cited by 2,110
Schultz, R. T. (2005) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012 · Cited by 1,071
Recognition of unfamiliar faces
Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01519-9 · Cited by 464
Self-citationYovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.018 · Cited by 450
A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.
Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037004 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Leder, H., & Bruce, V.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 513-536
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992585947
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Inverted Faces are Recognized: The Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/027249800390583
- The paper
- Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When Inverted Faces are Recognized: The Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/027249800390583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.