Cited by 2Design Education and PracticeCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceArt Education and Development

A Systematic Literature Review of Novice Visual Representations of Design Ideas: A Three-Pronged Design Sketching Framework

Ghahremani, Mehdi, Pereira, Nielsen, Ozen, Zafer, Gentry, Marcia·2024·Roeper Review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate how novice visual representation of design ideas has been operationalized, measured, or assessed in the research literature. In the different screening phases in this systematic review, inclusion, exclusion, and quality criteria were applied. From an initial sample of 958 articles, 40 studies were included in the final step of the coding process and qualitative synthesis. Applying provisional and open coding, three broad themes and 23 characteristics were identified that researchers used to conceptualize sketching of ideas in novice design activities: Communicating Ideas, Visual-Spatial Characteristics, and Design Creativity. We propose this Three-pronged Design Sketching (3-pDS) framework to examine and better understand novice design sketches, that is, K–16.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02783193.2024.2357538

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Authors
Ghahremani, M., Pereira, N., Ozen, Z., & Gentry, M.
Corresponding author
Ghahremani, Mehdi
Venue
Roeper Review
Published
2024-06-17
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
202-216
ISSN
  • 0278-3193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-865X
OpenAlex
W4399725417
Cited by
2
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Roeper Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
Keywords
design sketching, novice designers, design creativity, design thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review