Cited by 7Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New scheme for implementing the method of moments with interpolative closure

Open access
Yu, Mingzhou, Lin, Jianzhong·2017·Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract

This article presents a new scheme for implementing the method of moments with interpolative closure (MOMIC), which was proposed by Frenklach and Harris in 1987. The new scheme can be implemented with arbitrary moment sequences. A new interpolation scheme, which is implemented among the square root of logarithms of newly defined normalized moments, was verified to be suitable for interpolation with only three known data points. The new scheme was applied to studies on Brownian coagulation in both free-molecular and continuum-slip regimes. The new MOMIC with integer moment sequence was verified to exhibit nearly identical accuracy to its original version as well as other state-of-the-art numerical methods, including QMOM, TEMOM, and log MM, and higher accuracy than these referenced numerical methods as the fractional moment sequence was employed. The study enhances the capability of the MOMIC for solving population balance equations.© 2017 American Association for Aerosol Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02786826.2017.1319566

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Doraiswami R., 1985, Rev. Chem. Eng., 3, 49
  2. Friedlander S. K., 2000, Wiley Interscience
  3. 10.1080/02786829708965471 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/0021-9797(88)90180-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Yu, M., & Lin, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Jianzhong
Venue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2017-04-28
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
956-971
ISSN
  • 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-7388
OpenAlex
W2605388860
Cited by
7
References
44
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Aerosol Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ15A020002, 11372299, 11632016, LQ16A020002)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (11632016, 11372299, LQ16A020002, LQ15A020002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Keywords
population balance equation, Brownian coagulation, free molecular regime, aerosol size distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review