Cited by 337Granular flow and fluidized bedsAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

Numerical solution of the dynamic equation for particulate systems

Gelbard, Fred, Seinfeld, John H.·1978·Journal of Computational Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90058-x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hounslow et al. [287] compared numerical results with analytical solutions of Gelbard and Seinfeld [288] for constant and size-dependent coalescence kernels, then with experimental data, finding very good agreement.

    “First, they compared numerical results with the analytical solutions provided by Gelbard and Seinfeld [288] for the case of a constant coalescence and a size-dependent coalescence kernel. Afterward, they confronted the numerical results with experimental data concerning particle size and moment distributions, finding a very good agreement.”
  • QMOM used by Marchisio et al. [303] to model growth of crystal size with size-independent and size-dependent growth rates using realistic aggregation kernels was validated by comparing with analytical solutions and Monte-Carlo simulations.

    “The QMOM has been used by Marchisio et al. [303] to model the growth of crystal size with size-independent and size-dependent growth rates utilizing realistic aggregation kernels. The method has been validated by comparing the results with analytical solutions [288] and with results obtained with Monte-Carlo simulations.”
  • SQMOM tested for splitting in a continuous vessel, aggregation in a batch vessel, and simultaneous splitting and aggregation in a batch vessel; numerical results are in excellent agreement with analytical solutions provided the number of primary and secondary particles is adequately chosen.

    “The SQMOM has been tested for several cases i.e., splitting in a continuous vessel, aggregation in a batch vessel, and simultaneous splitting and aggregation in a batch vessel. The numerical results are in excellent agreement with the available analytical solutions [288,321,322] provided that the number of primary and secondary particles is adequately chosen.”
  • EQMOM numerical results compare favorably with available analytical ones for PBE considering aggregation, breakage, condensation, and evaporation.

    “The EQMOM has been used to solve a PBE considering aggregation, breakage, condensation, and evaporation terms, and the numerical results compare favorably with the available analytical ones [288,293,301,318,322].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gelbard, F., & Seinfeld, J. H.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Computational Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
357-375
ISSN
0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058745003
Cited by
337
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computational Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
population balance equation, particulate systems, collocation method, finite element analysis, particle size distribution, numerical accuracy, asymptotic solutions, particle dynamics simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review