Cited by 52Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Treatment of Marijuana Dependence: Preliminary Results

Roffman, Roger A., Stephens, Robert S., Simpson, Edith E., Whitaker, Daniel L.·1988·Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02791072.1988.10524382

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roffman, R. A., Stephens, R. S., Simpson, E. E., & Whitaker, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
1988-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
129-137
ISSN
  • 0279-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-9777
OpenAlex
W1995582972
Cited by
52
References
15
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
cannabis use disorder, addiction treatment, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Middle Aged, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review