CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 973Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success

Linnenbrink, Elizabeth A., Pintrich, Paul R.·2002·School Psychology Review
DOI 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Student motivation as an academic enabler for school success is discussed. Contrary to many views, however, the authors conceive of student motivation as a multifaceted construct with different components. Accordingly, the article includes a discussion of four key components of student motivation including academic self-efficacy, attributions, intrinsic motivation, and achievement goals. Research on each of these four components is described, research relating these four components to academic achievement and other academic enablers is reviewed, and suggestions are offered for instruction and assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mathematics self-efficacy has been found to act as a precursor to academic success.

    “Mathematics (MSE) self-efficacy is defined as students' beliefs about their abilities to learn and perform mathematical tasks (Bandura, 1997) and has been found to act as a precursor to academic success (Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002).”

    From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002

  • Feedback prevents students from either underestimating or overestimating their own abilities.

    “Feedback also prevents students from either underestimating or overestimating their own abilities (Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002;Zimmerman).”

    From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002

  • The opportunity to demonstrate mastery is often an important motivational factor for many students.

    “This opportunity to demonstrate mastery is often an important motivational factor for many students (Hidi & Harackiewicz, 2000;Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002) because they can, based on their own level of commitment, work until they achieve satisfactory results.”

    From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002

  • Self-efficacy strongly influences the choices that students make, how much effort they expend, and how they persist when obstacles arise.

    “Therefore, self-efficacy strongly influences the choices that students make, how much effort they expend, and how they persist when obstacles arise (Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002).”

    From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002

  • Students benefit from being given the opportunity to develop mastery.

    “Students benefit from being given the opportunity to develop mastery (Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002).”

    From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Linnenbrink, Elizabeth A.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
313-327
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
DOI
10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158
OpenAlex
W1519406596
Cited by
973
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 52
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student motivation, academic self-efficacy, attribution theory, intrinsic motivation, achievement goals, academic performance, instruction, assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review