Cited by 580Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsEducation and Learning InterventionsOnline and Blended Learning

How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach

Ai-Lim Lee, Elinda, Wong, Kok Wai, Fung, Chun Che·2010·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ai-Lim Lee, E., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C.
Affiliations
Murdoch University (AU)
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1424-1442
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013549369
Cited by
580
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Education and Learning Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
desktop virtual reality, learning outcomes, presence, motivation, cognitive benefits, perceived control, active learning, reflective thinking, spatial ability, learning styles, interaction experience, learning experience, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review