Cited by 483Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Assessment and Improvement

Implementation, Sustainability, and Scaling Up of Social-Emotional and Academic Innovations in Public Schools

Elias, Maurice J., Zins, Joseph E., Graczyk, Patricia A., Weissberg, Roger P.·2003·School Psychology Review

Abstract

Many attempts at bringing successful educational programs and products “to scale” as part of school reform, particularly in urban districts, have been disappointing. Based on the experiences of the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) and reviews of literature addressing implementation failures, observations about failures to “scale up” are presented. These include persistent structural features in educational settings that are too often unrecognized, the perpetuation of a narrow and decontextualized “programs and packages” perspective, poor management of time and other resources, and inadequate attention to characteristics of the adults who must carry out planned reforms. Several assumptions essential for success are identified, including the need to incorporate social and emotional learning as an integral part of academics and the ways in which diversity provides an ever-changing context for implementation. Concluding thoughts center around three points: the need to prepare professionals with the array of skills needed to lead efforts at scaling up school reform, the importance of an action-research perspective, and the need to better document the stories of educational innovation and scaling up efforts so that contextual details can enrich an understanding of what is required for success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2003.12086200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Graczyk, P. A., & Weissberg, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Elias, Maurice J.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
303-319
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W1593719938
Cited by
483
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 31
FWCI
87.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
social-emotional learning, scale-up, educational program implementation, educational reform, public schools, urban districts, program sustainability, CASEL, program management, school leadership, diversity, action research, educational innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review