The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Short-Term Estimates of Growth Using Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading Fluency: Estimating Standard Error of the Slope to Construct Confidence Intervals
Abstract
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is an established procedure used to index the level and trend of student growth. A substantial literature base exists regarding best practices in the administration and interpretation of CBM-R; however, research has yet to adequately address the potential influence of measurement error. This study extends results of Hintze and Christ (2004) by incorporating research-based estimates of the standard error of the estimate (SEE) to generate likely magnitudes for the standard error of the slope (SEb) across a variety of progress monitoring durations and measurement conditions. Fourteen progress monitoring durations (2-15 weeks) and nine levels of SEE (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18) were used to derive SEb. The outcomes are discussed in relation to assessment practices, such as selecting optimal progress monitoring durations to reduce measurement error. Implications and limitations are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More growth occurs from the beginning of the year to the middle of the year than from the middle to the end of the year, with overall growth being moderate [74] and more specifically from fall to spring than winter to spring [71].”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single-Subject Experimental Design for Evidence-Based Practice
Byiers, B. J., Reichle, J. E., & Symons, F. J. (2012) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036 · Cited by 339
Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading
Miura Wayman, M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401 · Cited by 428
Ardoin, S. P., Christ, T. J., Morena, L. S., Cormier, D. C., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2012) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.004 · Cited by 201
Self-citationvan den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2012.12087512 · Cited by 198
Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2009) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2009.12087808 · Cited by 145
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christ, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Christ, Theodore J.
- ORCID
- Christ, Theodore J.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-133
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W263645782
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- oral reading fluency, student development, progress monitoring, measurement error, confidence intervals, reading assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
