The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bullying and Peer Victimization at School: Perceptual Differences Between Students and School Staff
Abstract
Although bullying and other forms of peer victimization at school are a growing concern, there has been little research examining the potential differences between student and staff perceptions of the frequency of bullying, most common location and forms of bullying, severity of the problem, social norms related to bullying, and responses to witnessing bullying. The data for this study came from a district-wide survey of student (n = 15,185) and staff (n = 1,547) perceptions of and experiences with bullying conducted in 75 elementary, 20 middle, and 14 high schools. Results indicated that staff at all school levels (elementary, middle, and high) underestimated the number of students involved in frequent bullying. Both middle school students and staff tended to report the greatest exposure to and concern about bullying. Staff with greater efficacy for handling bullying situations were more likely to intervene and less likely to make the bullying situation worse. Staff members’ own experiences with bullying were predictive of their attitudes toward bullying and perceived efficacy for handling a bullying situation. Implications for prevention and intervention by school psychologists are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009 · Cited by 497
Waasdorp, T. E. (2012) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.755 · Cited by 263
Raskauskas, J., Rubiano, S., Offen, I., & Wayland, A. K. (2015) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9292-z · Cited by 72
Teachers’ Self-efficacy in Preventing and Intervening in School Bullying: a Systematic Review
Fischer, S. M., John, N., & Bilz, L. (2021) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-020-00079-y · Cited by 67
Obese and overweight youth: Risk for experiencing bullying victimization and internalizing symptoms.
Waasdorp, T. E., Mehari, K., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2018) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/ort0000294 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-382
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W1921750626
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bullying and Peer Victimization at School: Perceptual Differences Between Students and School Staff. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087929
- The paper
- Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and Peer Victimization at School: Perceptual Differences Between Students and School Staff. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.