Trade-offs in sustainability impacts of introducing cascade use of wood
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the sustainability impacts of allocating material from energy use to material use by adding cascaded wood into production of wood products. A case study is presented, where we analyse sustainability impacts of cascade use alternatives compared to the non-cascade use practice in particleboard production within the province of North Karelia, Finland. Direct impacts are captured using sustainability indicators representing environmental, economic and social aspects of sustainability. Results show that introducing cascaded wood can increase carbon storage in wood products, employment and production costs. Energy use and GHG emissions increase as well, when the total industrial activity during the lifetime of wood increases. We conclude that cascade use can improve resource efficiency as it enables the use of wood multiple times before combustion; however, the amount of waste wood for energy generation decreases locally, and alternative sources of energy need to be identified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A similar classification of waste wood exists in Finland.
“A similar classification exists in Finland,foot_0 as described by Suominen et al. (2017).”
From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Suominen et al. (2017)
The presence of chemicals in waste wood is the most prominent factor preventing the reuse or recycling of waste wood.
“the presence of chemicals in waste wood is the most prominent factor in preventing the reuse or recycling of waste wood (Table 2) (e.g., Bergeron, 2014;Kalcher et al., 2017;Suominen et al., 2017;Teuber et al., 2016).”
From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Suominen et al., 2017
There is a call for the design and labeling of products based on considerations of circularity and inclusion of end-of-life options.
“Similarly, Suominen et al. (2017) call for the design and labeling of products based on considerations of circularity and inclusion of end-of-life options.”
From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Suominen et al., 2017
Cites
Analysis of the Global Warming Potential for Wood Waste Recycling Systems
Kim, M. H., & Song, H. B. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.039 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
LCA-based optimization of wood utilization under special consideration of a cascading use of wood
Höglmeier, K., Steubing, B., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.018 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Life cycle impacts and benefits of wood along the value chain: the case of Switzerland
Suter, F., Steubing, B., & Hellweg, S. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12486 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Höglmeier, K., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2014) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0774-6 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Sikkema, R., Junginger, M., McFarlane, P., & Faaij, A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.007 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Winder, G. M., & Bobar, A. (2018) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.003 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Van Zanten, H. H. E., Metze, T. A. P., Termeer, C. J. A. M., van Ittersum, M. K., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading?
Jarre, M., Petit-Boix, A., Priefer, C., Meyer, R., & Leipold, S. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
- Authors
- Suominen, T., Kunttu, J., Jasinevičius, G., Tuomasjukka, D., & Lindner, M.
- Affiliations
- European Forest Institute (FI)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Suominen, Tommi
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 588-597
- ISSN
- 0282-7581 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1891
- OpenAlex
- W2626874196
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Marie Curie Initial Training Networks (316020)
- EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research (308393)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- wood products, particleboard, sustainability impacts, carbon storage, greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, resource efficiency, wood waste, employment, production costs, Northern Karelia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review