Cited by 19Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentForest Management and Policy

Responses to stimulate substitution and cascade use of wood within a wood use system: experience from Bavaria, Germany

Winder, Gordon M., Bobar, Amra·2018·Applied Geography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvements in project planning and the emergence of new technologies for better design of wooden products have been mentioned as enabling factors for more and better cascading implementation.

    “In particular, improvements in project planning (Fraanje, 1998;Höglmeier et al., 2017;Winder and Bobar, 2018) and the emergence of new technologies for better design of wooden products (Brunet-Navarro et al., 2018;Winder and Bobar, 2018) have been mentioned as enabling factors for more and better cascading implementation.”
  • Costly chemical analyses are often required for proper sorting, which motivates companies to choose the safest category in case of uncertainty.

    “Costly chemical analyses are often required for proper sorting, which motivates companies to choose the “safest” category in case of uncertainty (Winder and Bobar, 2018).”
  • Due to poor quality of wood sorting infrastructure, several German companies have declared they do not follow the legal requirements of classifying wood according to the AI-AIV categories, mainly because of increased direct and indirect costs.

    “In particular, due to the poor quality of wood sorting infrastructure, several German companies have declared they do not follow the legal requirements of classifying wood according to the AI-AIV categories (Section 3.3) mainly because of increased direct and indirect (time and organizational) costs.”
  • Conducting LCAs is costly and not mandatory for companies, which complicates the definition of sustainability criteria for supply chain management.

    “Nevertheless, Winder and Bobar (2018) note that conducting LCAs is costly and not mandatory for companies, which complicates the definition of sustainability criteria for supply chain management.”
  • Cascade use is a term unknown to some entrepreneurs.

    “Similarly, Winder and Bobar (2018) find that “cascade use [is] a term unknown to some entrepreneurs.””

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winder, G. M., & Bobar, A.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Winder, Gordon M.
Venue
Applied Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
90
Pages
350-359
ISSN
0143-6228 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2527697942
Cited by
19
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Geography (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bavarian government-funded research project
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
wood substitute, sustainability transitions, wood products, climate policy, barriers and opportunities, institutional environment, Bavaria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review