Cited by 109Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisForest Management and Policy

Life cycle impacts and benefits of wood along the value chain: the case of Switzerland

Open access
Suter, Florian, Steubing, Bernhard, Hellweg, Stefanie·2017·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Sustainable use of wood may contribute to coping with energy and material resource challenges. The goal of this study is to increase knowledge of the environmental effects of wood use by analyzing the complete value chain of all wooden goods produced or consumed in Switzerland. We start from a material flow analysis of current wood use in Switzerland. Environmental impacts related to the material flows are evaluated using life cycle assessment–based environmental indicators. Regarding climate change, we find an overall average benefit of 0.5 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent per cubic meter of wood used. High environmental benefits are often achieved when replacing conventional heat production and energy‐consuming materials in construction and furniture. The environmental performance of wood is, however, highly dependent on its use and environmental indicators. To exploit the mitigation potential of wood, we recommend to (1) apply its use where there are high substitution benefits like the replacement of fossil fuels for energy or energy‐intensive building materials, (2) take appropriate measures to minimize negative effects like particulate matter emissions, and (3) keep a systems perspective to weigh effects like substitution and cascading against each other in a comprehensive manner. The results can provide guidance for further in‐depth studies and prospective analyses of wood‐use scenarios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12486

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When forests are underexploited, an increased cascading use would lead to an underutilization of their full carbon storage potential.

    “Similarly, Suter et al. (2017) conclude that when forests are underexploited, an increased cascading use would lead to an underutilization of their full carbon storage potential.”

    From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Suter et al., 2017

    The Methodology section says that, in underused Swiss forests, additional cascading would primarily reduce wood extraction unless demand increased. The Introduction says underused forests do not fully realize their climate-mitigation potential, but it does not conclude that cascading underutilizes forests’ carbon-storage potential specifically; it also notes that forest wood stocks are increasing. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Biogenic carbon emissions have negligible impacts in the long term.

    “A similar problem arises when accounting for biogenic carbon emissions, as their impacts are negligible in the long term (Suter et al., 2017).”

    From Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading? (2020) · cites this paper as Suter et al., 2017

    In Discussion > Further Limitations, the paper says the long-term effects of biogenic CO2 emissions are negligible *in comparison to fossil CO2*. The citing sentence omits that comparator and presents the impacts as negligible without qualification. The paper also says their impact is considerable over time frames of 100 years or less. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prioritizing one use over the other depends on many factors and in general varies with the selected evaluation criteria.

    “Prioritizing one use over the other depends on many factors and in general varies with the selected evaluation criteria (Bais-Moleman et al., 2018;Suter et al., 2017;Werner et al., 2010).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. BAFU (Bundesamt für Umwelt). 2012a. Jahrbuch Wald und Holz [Swiss statistical yearbook of forestry]. Umwelt-Zustand. Vol. 1224. Bern, Switzerland: BAFU, Federal Office for the Environment.
  2. BAFU (Bundesamt für Umwelt). 2014. Jahrbuch Wald und Holz. [Swiss statistical yearbook of forestry] Umwelt-Zustand. Vol. 1224. Bern, Switzerland: BAFU, Federal Office for the Environment.
  3. Boucher, J. 2014. Assessing waste streams of building demolition and renovation in the City of Zurich. Project thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Walz, A., R. Taverna, and V. Stöckli. 2010. Holz nutzen ist wirksamer als Vorräte anhäufen [Use of wood is more effective than the accumulation of stocks]. Wald Und Holz 10(4): 37–40.
  5. Wenker, J. L. 2015. Ökobilanzierung komplexer Holzprodukte am Beispiel industriell hergestellter Möbel [LCA of complex wood products using the example of industrially produced furniture]. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suter, F., Steubing, B., & Hellweg, S.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Suter, Florian
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2016-09-26
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
874-886
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2529157349
Cited by
109
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (136612)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
wood utilization, wood value chain, climate change mitigation, CO2 emissions, material flow analysis, life cycle assessment, wood substitute, building materials, furniture, particulate emissions, cascading effects, Switzerland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review