Cited by 10Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Thermosensitivity in a reconstructed microtic ear.

Öberg, Martin, Becker, Magnus, Arktander, Marthe, Centerman, Maria, Svensson, Henry, Wikström, So·2008·Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate thermo-thresholds in autologous reconstructed microtic ears. Nineteen patients with unilateral microtia were investigated no less than two years after the last operation (3.6+/-1.7 years). Their normal corresponding ear acted as controls. Eight healthy children were also investigated to illustrate technical differences between measuring the two sides. Thermal sensitivity was tested quantitatively using a SENSELab MSA Thermotest. The skin temperature was also tested. Three different areas of the ear were examined: the lobe, the antihelix, and the helix. The reconstructed ear had a significantly higher skin temperature for all investigated areas compared with the normal ear (reconstructed ear 30.2+/-1.2 degrees C, normal ear 28.6+/-0.9 degrees C). For the controls there were no significant differences in any area. For the patients there were small differences in perception of cold between the reconstructed and the normal ear. There were significant differences in the antihelix region and the helix in heat perception in the reconstructed ear compared with the normal one (helix reconstructed ear 43.9+/-3.8 degrees C, helix normal ear 38.3+/-3.0 degrees C, antihelix reconstructed ear 39.9+/-3.0 degrees C, antihelix normal ear 36.4+/-1.7 degrees C). The reconstructed ear had a changed thermosensitivity, but there did not seem to be any clinical disadvantages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02844310802098458

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Öberg, M., Becker, M., Arktander, M., Centerman, M., Svensson, H., & Wikström, S.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery
Published
2008-01
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
190-193
ISSN
0284-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998078346
Cited by
10
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
microtia, microtia reconstruction, thermosensitivity, temperature thresholds, thermal sensation, cold sensation, skin temperature, ear reconstruction, antihelix, helix, earlobe
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Neurologic Examination, Sensory Thresholds, Skin Temperature, Thermosensing, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review