Cited by 19Educational Leadership and PracticesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesSchool Leadership and Teacher Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Planning for leadership succession: creating a talent pool in primary schools

Abstract

This article reports on a study that was funded by the National College for School Leadership in order to explore practices, drivers and barriers to leadership talent identification, leadership development, leadership succession planning and leadership retention within a group of contextually different schools. The article offers two narratives from primary school headteachers, operating in different circumstances, in order to show the ways in which schools are attempting to ‘grow their own’ leaders through systematic policies for leadership development. Key features of successful schools which consider themselves to be good at leadership development, which may be relevant to other primary schools, are outlined.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03004270600898919

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Brooking K., 2003, Australian Journal of Education, 47, 146, 10.1177/000494410304700204 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/03004270600670540 · DOI
  3. Byham W., 2003, Grow your own leaders
  4. Castagnoli P., 2004, Growing your own leaders: the impact of professional development on school improvement
  5. Clandinin D. J., 1991, The reflective turn: case studies in and on educational practice, 258
  6. 10.1108/09578230410554061 · DOI
  7. Coleman M., 2005, Leadership and management in education: cultures, change and context
  8. Connelly F. M., 1990, Educational Researcher, 19, 2, 10.3102/0013189X019005002 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13674580100200159 · DOI
  10. 2000, Statistics of education: teachers in England and Wales 2000
  11. 2001, Schools achieving success
  12. 2005, Higher standards, better schools for all: more choice for parents and pupils
  13. Draper J., 2003, Australian Journal of Education, 47, 185, 10.1177/000494410304700207 · DOI
  14. Eisner E. W., 1998, The enlightened eye: qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practices
  15. 10.1177/0013161X05278186 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1080/0013188032000086082 · DOI
  17. Flinders D. J., 1994, Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 341, 10.58680/rte199415362 · DOI
  18. 2002, Teachers on teaching: a survey of the teaching profession
  19. 10.1177/0263211X000283006 · DOI
  20. Gronn P., 2003, The new work of educational leaders
  21. 10.1080/1363243032000112784 · DOI
  22. Gronn P., 2003, Australian Journal of Education, 47, 172, 10.1177/000494410304700206 · DOI
  23. Hargreaves A., 2006, Sustainable leadership
  24. 10.1080/1363243032000112801 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1741143204039297 · DOI
  26. Hartle F., 2004, Growing tomorrow's school leaders
  27. Hayes T., 2005, Rising stars and sitting tenants: a picture of deputy headship in one London borough and how some of its schools are preparing their deputies for headship
  28. Hirsch W., 2000, Succession planning demystified
  29. 2002, Management in Education, 15, 17
  30. 2004, LDR Magazine for School Leaders, 11, 16
  31. Lincoln Y., 1986, Naturalistic evaluation, 73
  32. McCall M. W., 1998, High flyers: developing the next generation of leaders
  33. 10.1177/0263211X030314007 · DOI · Paper page
  34. O'Connor M., 2004, Nurse Leader, 21
  35. 10.1080/13634230500492954 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/089202060501900504 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1080/13632430600737124 · DOI
  38. Rothwell W. J., 2005, Effective succession planning: ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within
  39. Shaw M., 2006, Times Educational Supplement, 2
  40. Thomson P., 2003, Australian Journal of Education, 47, 118, 10.1177/000494410304700202 · DOI
  41. 10.1076/sesi.13.2.163.3433 · DOI
  42. Williams T. R., 2003, Australian Journal of Education, 47, 159, 10.1177/000494410304700205 · DOI
  43. Wolfe R., 1996, Systematic succession planning: building leadership from within

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brundrett, M., Rhodes, C., & Gkolia, C.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Brundrett, Mark
Venue
Education 3-13
Published
2006-10
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
259-268
ISSN
  • 0300-4279 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7575
OpenAlex
W2006172415
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Education 3-13 (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Keywords
leadership succession planning, leadership development, talent identification, leadership retention, primary school headteachers, school leadership, talent pool, school leadership policy, barriers to leadership development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review