Cited by 5Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Lipid clinic experience with bempedoic acid in three UK centres

Jakubowska, Agnieszka, Al Hasani, Wiaam, Williams, Jamal, MacMahon, Zofia, Balbas, Bryan, Crook, Martin A., Viljoen, Adie, Reynolds, Timothy M. +1 more·2024·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

Objective Novel lipid-lowering therapies are being introduced. Few studies exist of the real-world effectiveness of adenosine-tri-phosphate citrate lyase inhibition with bempedoic acid. Methods This study audited bempedoic acid therapy in 216 consecutive patients from three hospital centres - a university hospital ( n = 77) and two district general hospitals ( n = 106 and 33). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, prescription qualification criteria, efficacy and adverse effects were assessed. Results The population was aged 65.9 ± 11.0 years, 42% were male, 25% had type 2 diabetes, and 31% had familial hypercholesterolaemia. CVD was present in 19% and multibed vascular disease in 8%. Statin intolerance was reported in 92%. Bempedoic acid reduced total cholesterol by 1.58 ± 1.44 mmol/L (20%), LDL-C by 1.37 ± 1.31 mmol/L (27%), triglycerides by 0.22 mmol/L (2%) with an 0.06 mmol/L (1%) increase in HDL-C after 22 ± 9 months follow-up. An LDL- C 2 = .33) was predicted by baseline LDL-C ( β = .54; p 1c . Treatment was discontinued by 33% of patients and occurred due to myalgia (43%), lack of efficacy (16%) and gastrointestinal adverse effects (15%). No cases of gout were observed. In a logistic regression only the number of previous drug classes not tolerated ( β = 1.60; p = .009) was a contributing factor to discontinuation. Conclusion This audit suggests that bempedoic acid therapy is effective but that adverse effects and discontinuation are common. This suggests nocebo e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03007995.2024.2341870

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that study, bempedoic acid achieved a 27% LDL-C reduction at 22-month follow-up.

    “In this study, bempedoic acid achieved a 27% LDL-C reduction at 22-month follow-up (baseline LDL-C = 164 mg/dL) [41].”
  • In a mixed prevention cohort that included patients with monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (31%), drug intolerance to at least two statins was reported in 89% of patients.

    “In a mixed prevention cohort that included patients with monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (31%), drug intolerance to at least two statins was reported in 89% of patients;”
  • In the same study, patients who discontinued bempedoic acid had a greater number of total lipid-lowering drug classes not tolerated (1.89 vs 1.46; p = 0.003) compared to those who remained on treatment.

    “One study found that patients who discontinued bempedoic acid had a higher number of previously non-tolerated statins (2.86 vs 2.41; p = 0.02) and a greater number of total lipid-lowering drug classes not tolerated (1.89 vs 1.46; p = 0.003) compared to those who remained on treatment [41].”
  • In one study, patients who discontinued bempedoic acid had a higher number of previously non-tolerated statins (2.86 vs 2.41; p = 0.02) compared to those who remained on treatment.

    “One study found that patients who discontinued bempedoic acid had a higher number of previously non-tolerated statins (2.86 vs 2.41; p = 0.02) and a greater number of total lipid-lowering drug classes not tolerated (1.89 vs 1.46; p = 0.003) compared to those who remained on treatment [41].”
  • In a mixed prevention cohort that included 31% patients with monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia, 40% of patients on bempedoic acid achieved an LDL-C target of <97 mg/dL (baseline LDL-C = 164 mg/dL).

    “In one study in a mixed prevention cohort that included patients with monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (31%), 40% of patients on bempedoic acid achieved a target of <97 mg/dL, and 20.0% achieved this when the target was set at <77 mg/dL (baseline LDL-C = 164 mg/dL) [41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jakubowska, A., Al Hasani, W., Williams, J., MacMahon, Z., Balbas, B., Crook, M. A., Viljoen, A., Reynolds, T. M., & Wierzbicki, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Lister Hospital (GB)
  • Department of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Guy’s &amp; St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • Department of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Queen’s Hospital, Burton-on-Trent, UK
Corresponding author
Wierzbicki, Anthony S.
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2024-04-25
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
911-916
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W4394818204
Cited by
5
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
bempedoic acid, ATP-citrate lyase inhibition, lipid-lowering therapy, statin intolerance, LDL cholesterol lowering, triglyceride lowering, adverse effects, treatment discontinuation, myalgia, nocebo effect, familial hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, real-world effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review