Cited by 43Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid metabolism and disorders

Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
De Filippo, Ovidio, D’Ascenzo, Fabrizio, Iannaccone, Mario, Bertaina, Maurizio, Leone, Attilio, Borzillo, Irene, Ravetti, Emanuele, Solano, Andrea +9 more·2023·Cardiovascular Diabetology

Abstract

Background and aims: Bempedoic Acid (BA) is a novel Lipid-Lowering Therapy (LLT). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of BA in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were searched for randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of BA compared with placebo. Trials investigating dosages other than 180 mg/die were excluded. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were the primary efficacy endpoint. LDL-cholesterol reduction was the primary laboratory endpoint. Pre-specified safety endpoints included muscle-related adverse events, new-onset diabetes, and gout. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (temporary ID:399,867). Results: Study search identified 275 deduplicated results. 11 studies, encompassing 18,315 patients (9854 on BA vs 8461 on placebo/no treatment) were included. BA was associated with a reduced risk of MACE (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.95), myocardial infarction (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.88) and unstable angina (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54–0.88) compared to control, over a median follow up of 87 (15–162) weeks. BA was associated with a reduction of LDL-Cholesterol (mean difference [MD]–22.42,95% CI − 24.02% to − 20.82%), total cholesterol (− 16.50%,95% − 19.21% to − 13.79%), Apo-B lipoprotein (− 19.55%, − 22.68% to − 16.42%) and high-sensitivity CRP (− 27.83%, − 31.71% to − 23.96%) at 12 weeks. BA was associated with a higher risk of gout (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27–1.90) as compared with placebo. Efficacy on laboratory endpoints was confirmed, with a variable extent, across patients on statin or ezetimibe background therapy. Conclusions: The improved cholesterol control achieved with BA translates into a reduced risk of MACE, including myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation. The drug has a satisfactory safety profile except for an increased risk of gout.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12933-023-02022-z

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bempedoic acid lowers LDL cholesterol levels by 15% for those on statins and 24% for those not taking statins.

    “Bempedoic acid, a novel LDL cholesterollowering agent acting in the same pathway as statin but without activity in skeletal muscle, which limits the muscle-related adverse effects, lowers LDL cholesterol levels by 15% for those on statins and 24% for those not taking statins (140).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [140]

    The Results report an approximately 24% LDL-C reduction without background statins, but reductions with statins varied by intensity: 15.67% with high-intensity statins and 19.58% with moderate- or low-intensity statins. The citing sentence omits that qualification when it says 15% for those on statins. The Introduction supports its description of bempedoic acid’s pathway and lack of activation in skeletal muscle. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bempedoic acid lowers LDL cholesterol levels by 15% for those on statins and 24% for those not taking statins.

    “Bempedoic acid, a newer LDL cholesterol–lowering agent targeting the same pathway as statins but without activity in skeletal muscle, thus limiting muscle-related adverse effects, lowers LDL cholesterol levels by 15% for those on statins and 24% for those not taking statins (134).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [134]

    The Results (page unavailable) report a 24.13% LDL-C reduction without background statin therapy and a 15.67% reduction with high-intensity statins. They report a 19.58% reduction with moderate- or low-intensity statins, so the citing sentence overgeneralizes the 15% figure to everyone taking statins. The Introduction also supports the description of bempedoic acid’s pathway and limited skeletal-muscle activity. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Use of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe results in an additional 19% reduction in LDL cholesterol.

    “Use of this agent with ezetimibe results in an additional 19% reduction in LDL cholesterol (140).”
  • Use of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe results in an additional 19% reduction in LDL cholesterol.

    “Use of this agent with ezetimibe results in an additional 19% reduction in LDL cholesterol (134).”
  • Bempedoic acid has generally been well tolerated.

    “The drug has generally been well tolerated, although an increased risk of gout has been observed [18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Filippo, O., D’Ascenzo, F., Iannaccone, M., Bertaina, M., Leone, A., Borzillo, I., Ravetti, E., Solano, A., Pagliassotto, I., Nebiolo, M., Bruno, F., Giacobbe, F., Muscoli, S., Monticone, S., Brizzi, M. F., Biondi Zoccai, G., & De Ferrari, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
D’Ascenzo, Fabrizio
Venue
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Published
2023-11-28
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
324-324
ISSN
1475-2840 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389083456
Cited by
43
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Diabetology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
bempedoic acid, hypercholesterolemia, lipid-lowering therapy, LDL cholesterol lowering, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, gout, new-onset diabetes, apolipoprotein B, high-sensitivity CRP, drug safety, drug efficacy
MeSH terms
Cholesterol, Dicarboxylic Acids, Fatty Acids, Gout, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Myocardial Infarction, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review